Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27135525›Full record

SynthesisChildhood obesity (Print)2016

Association of Picky Eating and Food Neophobia with Weight: A Systematic Review.

Callie L Brown, Emily B Vander Schaaf, Gail M Cohen, Megan B Irby, Joseph A Skelton

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Childhood obesity (Print), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Sensory processing and eating behaviours in autism: A systematic review.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Garden-based interventions and early childhood health: an umbrella review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Childhood fussy/picky eating behaviours: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Food intake and eating behaviour during a real-life Snack Scenario in childhood obesity-An experiment using a hidden camera.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2025
    Observational
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Callie L Brown1 Department of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC.
Emily B Vander Schaaf1 Department of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill , Chapel Hill, NC.
Gail M Cohen2 Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC.
Megan B Irby2 Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC.
Joseph A Skelton2 Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest School of Medicine , Winston-Salem, NC.

Funding

Attrition in Pediatric Weight ManagementK23HD061597 · NICHD · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SKELTON, JOSEPH ARNOLD · 2010 to 2014
$875k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD061597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPicky eating and food neophobia are common during childhood. Childhood eating behaviors are often predictive of adult eating behaviors.

objectivesDetermine if childhood picky eating or food neophobia is associated with childhood weight status, or with becoming underweight, overweight, or obese later in childhood. DATA SOURCES: We identified relevant studies from searches of PubMed, PsycINFO, and NEOHAL, as well as citations from identified studies. Study Eligibility Criteria and Participants: Inclusion criteria were original research articles examining a relationship between picky eating and/or food neophobia with childhood weight status. We summarized definitions and prevalence of picky eating or food neophobia and association with weight status. STUDY APPRAISAL: Two independent investigators assessed bias and confounding using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's RTI Item Bank.

resultsForty-one studies met inclusion criteria. Picky eating was defined inconsistently, and a large variation in prevalence was found (5.8%-59%). Food neophobia was consistently defined as an unwillingness to try new foods, with a prevalence between 40% and 60%. No association existed between childhood weight status and food neophobia, and results were unclear for picky eating. LIMITATIONS: Risk of bias and confounding were moderate. Parental report was commonly used to assess picky eating, height, and weight and parental weight, feeding styles, and community characteristics were infrequently considered. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Heterogeneous definitions used for picky eating led to a wide range of reported prevalence and an unclear relationship with weight. Consistent definitions and an improved understanding of such a relationship could help clinicians provide appropriate anticipatory guidance.

Indexed as

Body WeightChildChild BehaviorChild Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaEatingEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFood PreferencesHumansOverweightParent-Child RelationsParentingPhobic DisordersThinness

Identifiers

PMID27135525
PMCPMC4964761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.