ArticleAdvanced biomedical research2016
Pentoxifylline treatment in patients with cancer cachexia: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Article in Advanced biomedical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for cancer cachexia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Cancer medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Quality of life endpoints in cancer cachexia clinical trials: Systematic review 3 of the cachexia endpoints series.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024Pooled it
- Body weight and composition endpoints in cancer cachexia clinical trials: Systematic Review 4 of the cachexia endpoints series.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2024Pooled it
- Pharmacological management of cachexia in adult cancer patients: a systematic review of clinical trials.BMC cancer · 2018Pooled it
- Advancing Cancer Cachexia Drug Development: Leveraging Biomarkers and Functional Endpoints to Optimize Trial Design.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Nutraceutical Interception of Cachexia: Grape-Derived Compounds as Pathophysiological Network Modulators.Biology · 2025Review
- Chemotherapy with a molecular rational basis, pentoxifylline as a promising antitumor drug.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Cancer cachexia: multilevel metabolic dysfunction.Nature metabolism · 2024Review
- Cancer-triggered systemic disease and therapeutic targets.Holistic integrative oncology · 2024Article
- Review
- Tumor cell anabolism and host tissue catabolism-energetic inefficiency during cancer cachexia.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Neural Mechanisms of Cancer Cachexia.Cancers · 2021Review
- Repurposing of Antibiotic Sulfisoxazole Inhibits Lipolysis in Pre-Clinical Model of Cancer-Associated Cachexia.Biology · 2021Article
- Cancer-Mediated Muscle Cachexia: Etiology and Clinical Management.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2021Review
- Cancer Cachexia: Definition, Staging, and Emerging Treatments.Cancer management and research · 2020Review
- Management of Cancer Cachexia: Attempting to Develop New Pharmacological Agents for New Effective Therapeutic Options.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Revisiting Cancer Cachexia: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Current Treatment Approaches.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursingReview
- Pentoxifylline improves the quality of life in type-2 diabetes foot syndrome.Pakistan journal of medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCachexia can occur as part of many end-stage or chronic diseases, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of Pentoxifylline in patients with cancer cachexia. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe present study was conducted as a double-blind randomized controlled trial on 70 patients with advanced malignancy who loss of >5% of ideal or preillness body weight in the previous 2 months. Patients were assessed in two groups: case group, under treatment, using Pentoxifylline (400 mg) three times a day, for 2 months, and in the control group, patients received placebo. Age, sex, weight change, change in arm circumference and quality of life were assessed at baseline, week-4 and week-8.
resultsThe mean age of the patients was 56 ± 17.3 years and 47% were female. Weight and arm circumference decreased during follow-up in both groups, but these differences between case and controls were not statistically significant. Quality of life (QOL) score in the case group improved after 4 weeks then decreased at the end of treatment but in the control group QOL score decreased during 2 month treatment. In week-4 patients in the case group significantly reported higher score of QOL compare to patients in the control group (P = 0.029).
conclusionResults of this study demonstrated that Pentoxifylline in the treatment of cancer cachexia did not have any effect in weight gain and arm circumference in cachectic patients. But in short-term (1 month) treatment, QOL was improved in these patients. And after 2 month treatment this was not effective compared to placebo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.