ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2016
Imprudent Gastro-protective Approach in Majority of Specialists' Clinics of a Tertiary Hospital.
Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOne out of four prescriptions in out-patient departments contains a gastro-protective drug (APUD) - PPI/ H2 Blockers/ Antacids/ Ulcer Protective's. These drugs should be prescribed only when there is a justified indication. To assess the prescriptions of gastro-protective agents for appropriateness and rationality, in a tertiary care hospital setup. MATERIALS AND
methodsIt was a cross-sectional observational study conducted from Aug 2013 to Dec 2013 at OPDs of a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital, Pune. A total of 260 prescriptions containing gastro-protective agents were analysed for appropriateness and rationality. Rationality of drug use was assessed by referring to standard textbooks and guidelines. Cost difference data was analysed by Wilcoxon signed rank test using GraphPad Prism 6.
resultsMost common class of gastro-protective agents was Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)-73.77% (Pantoprazole & Dexrabeprazole). Only 37.3% prescriptions had an adequate indication for these drugs {GI prophylaxis (29.6%) and Acid Peptic Disease treatment (7.7%)}. Two irrational Fixed dose combinations found in the study were PPI with prokinetic agent (n=65) and Proton Pump Inhibitor + NSAID combination (n=2). Formulation, spelling and strength errors were found with 75 prescribed drugs. Medication instructions were lacking with most of the drugs. Drug interactions with co-prescribed drugs could be anticipated in 79 cases. Injudicious use of anti-peptic ulcer agents significantly increased the cost of prescriptions (p<0.0001).
conclusionAnti-ulcer drugs are overenthusiastically prescribed by all specialties which can predispose to adverse effects, drug interactions, increased cost and even erroneous prescriptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.