Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27134739›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2016

Wnt signaling in cancer stem cells and colon cancer metastasis.

Sayon Basu, Gal Haase, Avri Ben-Ze'ev

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Exploring the Key Signaling Pathways and ncRNAs in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. H19: An Oncogenic Long Non-coding RNA in Colorectal Cancer.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Proapoptotic and Antiproliferative Effects of the Desert TruffleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sayon Basu *Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Gal Haase *Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Avri Ben-Ze'evDepartment of Molecular Cell Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overactivation of Wnt signaling is a hallmark of colorectal cancer (CRC). The Wnt pathway is a key regulator of both the early and the later, more invasive, stages of CRC development. In the normal intestine and colon, Wnt signaling controls the homeostasis of intestinal stem cells (ISCs) that fuel, via proliferation, upward movement of progeny cells from the crypt bottom toward the villus and differentiation into all cell types that constitute the intestine. Studies in recent years suggested that cancer stem cells (CSCs), similar to ISCs of the crypts, consist of a small subpopulation of the tumor and are responsible for the initiation and progression of the disease. Although various ISC signature genes were also identified as CRC markers and some of these genes were even demonstrated to have a direct functional role in CRC development, the origin of CSCs and their contribution to cancer progression is still debated. Here, we describe studies supporting a relationship between Wnt-regulated CSCs and the progression of CRC.

Indexed as

cancer stem cellscolorectal cancerintestinal stem cellsLgr5Wntβ-catenin

Identifiers

PMID27134739
PMCPMC4841194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.