Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27134413›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2016

lower limbs kinematic assessment of the effect of a gym and hydrotherapy rehabilitation protocol after knee megaprosthesis: a case report.

Nicola Lovecchio, Luciana Sciumè, Matteo Zago, Lorenzo Panella, Maurizio Lopresti, Chiarella Sforza

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Effects of Insole-Based Visual Feedback on Weight-Bearing in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Replacement.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola LovecchioLaboratorio di Anatomia Funzionale dell'Apparato Locomotore, Functional Anatomy Research Center (FARC), Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano: via Mangiagalli 31 I-20133 Milano, Italy.
Luciana SciumèScuola di Specializzazione in Medicina Fisica e Riabilitazione, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.
Matteo ZagoLaboratorio di Anatomia Funzionale dell'Apparato Locomotore, Functional Anatomy Research Center (FARC), Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano: via Mangiagalli 31 I-20133 Milano, Italy.
Lorenzo PanellaS.C. Medicina Fisica e Riabilitazione, Istituto Ortopedico G. Pini, Italy.
Maurizio LoprestiS.C. Medicina Fisica e Riabilitazione, Istituto Ortopedico G. Pini, Italy.
Chiarella SforzaLaboratorio di Anatomia Funzionale dell'Apparato Locomotore, Functional Anatomy Research Center (FARC), Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano: via Mangiagalli 31 I-20133 Milano, Italy.
University of Milan · ITIstituto Ortopedico Gaetano Pini · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] To quantitatively assess the effect of a personalized rehabilitation protocol after knee megaprosthesis. [Subject and Methods] The gait patterns of a 33-year-old male patient with knee synovial sarcoma were assessed by a computerized analysis before and after 40 rehabilitation sessions. [Results] The rehabilitation protocol improved the gait pattern. After rehabilitation, hip flexion was nearly symmetric, with normalized affected limb hip flexion, and improved ankle flexion. Ankle in/eversion was asymmetric and did not improve after physiotherapy. Before physiotherapy, the hip flexion on the affected side anticipated the movement but nearly normalized in the follow-up assessment. Hip abduction range of motion increased, with wider movements and good balance. Knee range of motion nearly symmetrized, but maintained an anticipated behavior, without shock absorption at heel-strike. [Conclusion] Instrumental gait analysis allowed us to gain evidence about the training and how to expand rehabilitative interventions to improve efficacy. In particular, we recommend quadriceps and gastrocnemius eccentric contraction training (to improve the shock absorption phase, preventing early failures of the prosthesis); one-leg standing performance (to improve the support phase of the affected limb); adductor strength training (to aid in hip control during the swing phase); and peroneus strength training (to increase ankle joint stabilization).

Indexed as

GaitKnee megaprosthesisLimb-saving surgery

Identifiers

PMID27134413
PMCPMC4842425
OpenAlexW2331094791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.