ReviewTrends in cardiovascular medicine2016
Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED).
Review in Trends in cardiovascular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in the Heart of Medicine: A Systematic Approach to Transforming Arrhythmia Care with Intelligent Systems.Current cardiology reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Expert Consensus Statement: Committee on Implantable Devices and Committee on Social Issues, Japanese Heart Rhythm Society (JHRS) Statement on Remote Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.Journal of arrhythmia · 2026Article
- Recommendations for sharing cardiovascular implantable electronic device data with patients based on clinician interviews.Heart rhythm O2 · 2026Article
- Pacemakers in Modern Cardiology and Their Transition From Traditional to Leadless Models.Cureus · 2025Review
- Predictors of complications and mortality among patients undergoing pacemaker implantation in resource-limited settings: a 10-year retrospective follow-up study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Patient informed consent, ethical and legal considerations in the context of digital vulnerability with smart, cardiac implantable electronic devices.PLOS digital health · 2024Review
- 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic.Journal of arrhythmia · 2023Article
- 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Iron therapy and severe arrhythmias in HFrEF: rationale, study design, and baseline results of the RESAFE-HF trial.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Analysis of Pharmacy Cardiac Optimization Clinic for Patients with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation Detected via Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Clinic.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Racial and ethnic differences in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patient selection, management, and outcomes.Heart rhythm O2 · 2022Review
- Cardiac implantable electronic devices: an overview for primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022Review
- Outpatient Initiation of Sotalol in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Utility of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices for Therapy Monitoring.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2021Article
- Returning Cardiac Rhythm Data to Patients: Opportunities and Challenges.Cardiac electrophysiology clinics · 2021Review
- Real-world Adoption of Smartphone-based Remote Monitoring Using the Confirm Rx™ Insertable Cardiac Monitor.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2021Article
- Ethical and Legal Implications of Remote Monitoring of Medical Devices.The Milbank quarterly · 2020Article
- What Coronavirus Disease 2019 Has Taught Us About Modern Electrophysiology Practice.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2020Article
- Multicenter Analysis of Dosing Protocols for Sotalol Initiation.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics · 2020Observational
- Wearables for arrhythmia care: Challenges and future prospects.Cardiovascular digital health journalArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With increasing indications and access to cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) worldwide, the number of patients needing CIED follow-up continues to rise. In parallel, the technology available for managing these devices has advanced considerably. In this setting, remote monitoring (RM) has emerged as a complement to routine in-office care. Rigorous studies, randomized and otherwise, have demonstrated advantages to patient with CIED management systems, which incorporates RM resulting in authoritative guidelines from relevant professional societies recommending RM for all eligible patients. In addition to clinical benefits, CIED management programs that include RM have been shown to be cost effective and associated with high patient satisfaction. Finally, RM programs hold promise for the future of CIED research in light of the massive data collected through RM databases converging with unprecedented computational capability. This review outlines the available data associated with clinical outcomes in patients managed with RM with an emphasis on randomized trials; the impact of RM on patient satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, and healthcare utilization; and possible future directions for the use of RM in clinical practice and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.