Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27134005›Full record

ArticleJournal of educational evaluation for health professions2016

Is a decentralized continuing medical education program feasible for Chinese rural health professionals?

Guijie Hu, Yanhua Yi

Open access · diamondAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guijie HuThe Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9404-5108
Yanhua YiSchool for International Education, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8690-952X
Guangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNGuangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRural health professionals in township health centers (THCs) tend to have less advanced educational degrees. This study aimed to ascertain the perceived feasibility of a decentralized continuing medical education (CME) program to upgrade their educational levels.

methodsA cross-sectional survey of THC health professionals was conducted using a self-administered, structured questionnaire in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.

resultsThe health professionals in the THCs were overwhelmingly young with low education levels. They had a strong desire to upgrade their educational degrees. The decentralized CME program was perceived as feasible by health workers with positive attitudes about the benefit for license examination, and by those who intended to improve their clinical diagnosis and treatment skills. The target groups of such a program were those who expected to undertake a bachelor's degree and who rated themselves as "partially capable" in clinical competency. They reported that 160-400 USD annually would be an affordable fee for the program.

conclusionA decentralized CME program was perceived feasible to upgrade rural health workers' education level to a bachelor's degree and improve their clinical competency.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceRural Health ServicesRural PopulationAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, ContinuingFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansLicensureMaleMiddle AgedMotivationChinaClinical competenceContinuing medical educationHealth personnelLicensure

Identifiers

PMID27134005
PMCPMC4863136
OpenAlexW2343512947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.