Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27133939›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2016

Perceived and geographic food access and food security status among households with children.

Xiaoguang Ma, Angela D Liese, Bethany A Bell, Lauren Martini, James Hibbert, Carrie Draper, Michael P Burke, Sonya J Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Perception of the Food Environment and Food Security Levels of Residents of the City of Rio de Janeiro.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. LGBTQ+ food insufficiency in New England.Agriculture and human values · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaoguang Ma1Center for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities,Arnold School of Public Health,University of South Carolina,921 Assembly Street,Columbia,SC 29208,USA.
Angela D Liese1Center for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities,Arnold School of Public Health,University of South Carolina,921 Assembly Street,Columbia,SC 29208,USA.
Bethany A Bell1Center for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities,Arnold School of Public Health,University of South Carolina,921 Assembly Street,Columbia,SC 29208,USA.
Lauren Martini1Center for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities,Arnold School of Public Health,University of South Carolina,921 Assembly Street,Columbia,SC 29208,USA.
James Hibbert1Center for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities,Arnold School of Public Health,University of South Carolina,921 Assembly Street,Columbia,SC 29208,USA.
Carrie Draper1Center for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities,Arnold School of Public Health,University of South Carolina,921 Assembly Street,Columbia,SC 29208,USA.
Michael P Burke5US Department of Agriculture,Food and Nutrition Service,Alexandria,VA,USA.
Sonya J Jones1Center for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities,Arnold School of Public Health,University of South Carolina,921 Assembly Street,Columbia,SC 29208,USA.

Funding

Biomedical-Behavioral Interface: Prevention and Developmental Sciences TrainingT32GM081740 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI PRINZ, RONALD J · 2008 to 2022
$4.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM081740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the association of both perceived and geographic neighbourhood food access with food security status among households with children.

designThis was a cross-sectional study in which participants' perceptions of neighbourhood food access were assessed by a standard survey instrument, and geographic food access was evaluated by distance to the nearest supermarket. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to examine the associations. SUBJECTS: The Midlands Family Study included 544 households with children in eight counties in South Carolina, USA. Food security status among participants was classified into three categories: food secure (FS), food insecure (FI) and very low food security among children (VLFS-C).

resultsCompared with FS households, VLFS-C households had lower odds of reporting easy access to adequate food shopping. VLFS-C households also had lower odds of reporting neighbourhood access to affordable fruits and vegetables compared with FS households and reported worse selection of fruits and vegetables, quality of fruits and vegetables, and selection of low-fat products. FI households had lower odds of reporting fewer opportunities to purchase fast food. None of the geographic access measures was significantly associated with food security status.

conclusionsCaregivers with children who experienced hunger perceived that they had less access to healthy affordable food in their community, even though grocery stores were present. Approaches to improve perceived access to healthy affordable food should be considered as part of the overall approach to improving food security and eliminating child hunger.

Indexed as

DietFood SupplyHungerResidence CharacteristicsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFamily CharacteristicsGeographyHumansPovertySouth CarolinaChildFood accessFood securityHungerSupplemental Nutrition Assistance Program

Identifiers

PMID27133939
PMCPMC5588026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.