Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27133489›Full record

ReviewRheumatic diseases clinics of North America2016

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis.

Ana-Maria Orbai, Alexis Ogdie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The impact of psoriatic arthritis on quality of life: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ana-Maria OrbaiDivision of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Asthma and Allergy Building, Room 1B19, 5501 Hopkins Bayview Circle, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. Electronic address: aorbai1@jhmi.edu.
Alexis OgdieDivision of Rheumatology, Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, White Building, Room 5024, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Funding

Identification of Early Psoriatic ArthritisK23AR063764 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI OGDIE, ALEXIS R. · 2013 to 2017
$751k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR063764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are an important component to assessing disease impact and therapy response in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Overall, there are few PsA-specific PROs. Most PROs used in PsA are borrowed from other diseases (eg, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis) or general population PROs. PROs are used in PsA clinical trials and in the clinical management of PsA. In this review, we discuss the most commonly used PRO in PsA, including their inclusion in composite measures. Future studies may be helpful to determine the best performing PROs in patients with PsA.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeArthralgiaArthritis, PsoriaticClinical Trials as TopicFatigueHumansObservational Studies as TopicPruritusSurveys and QuestionnairesComposite measuresOutcome measurePatient reported outcomePsoriatic arthritis

Identifiers

PMID27133489
PMCPMC4853652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.