Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27133484›Full record

ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA2016

RNA-binding proteins in eye development and disease: implication of conserved RNA granule components.

Soma Dash, Archana D Siddam, Carrie E Barnum, Sarath Chandra Janga, Salil A Lachke

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Polymorphisms in TRIB2 and CAPRIN2 Genes Contribute to the Susceptibility to High Myopia-Induced Cataract in Han Chinese Population.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Soma DashDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Archana D SiddamDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Carrie E BarnumDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Sarath Chandra JangaDepartment of Biohealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University & Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Salil A LachkeDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
University of Delaware · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
POST TRANSCRIPTIONAL CONTROL OF GENE EXPRESSION IN THE LENS (LENS GENE EXPRESSIONR01EY021505 · NEI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI LACHKE, SALIL · 2011 to 2024
$5.3M
Mapping RNA protein interaction networks in the human genomeR01GM123314 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI JANGA, SARATH CHANDRA · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021505NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123314
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular biology of metazoan eye development is an area of intense investigation. These efforts have led to the surprising recognition that although insect and vertebrate eyes have dramatically different structures, the orthologs or family members of several conserved transcription and signaling regulators such as Pax6, Six3, Prox1, and Bmp4 are commonly required for their development. In contrast, our understanding of posttranscriptional regulation in eye development and disease, particularly regarding the function of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), is limited. We examine the present knowledge of RBPs in eye development in the insect model Drosophila as well as several vertebrate models such as fish, frog, chicken, and mouse. Interestingly, of the 42 RBPs that have been investigated for their expression or function in vertebrate eye development, 24 (~60%) are recognized in eukaryotic cells as components of RNA granules such as processing bodies, stress granules, or other specialized ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. We discuss the distinct developmental and cellular events that may necessitate potential RBP/RNA granule-associated RNA regulon models to facilitate posttranscriptional control of gene expression in eye morphogenesis. In support of these hypotheses, three RBPs and RNP/RNA granule components Tdrd7, Caprin2, and Stau2 are linked to ocular developmental defects such as congenital cataract, Peters anomaly, and microphthalmia in human patients or animal models. We conclude by discussing the utility of interdisciplinary approaches such as the bioinformatics tool iSyTE (integrated Systems Tool for Eye gene discovery) to prioritize RBPs for deriving posttranscriptional regulatory networks in eye development and disease. WIREs RNA 2016, 7:527-557. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1355 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDrosophilaEyeEye DiseasesHumansRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27133484
PMCPMC4909581
OpenAlexW2346320382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.