ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017
Femoral revision surgery using a fully hydroxyapatite-coated stem: a cohort study of twenty two to twenty seven years.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cementless long-stem fixation in periprosthetic clamshell fracture: a biomechanical investigation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Clinical and radiographic outcomes of long monoblock, hydroxyapatite-coated stem in revision hip arthroplasty with extended trochanteric osteotomy: a multicenter study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- A bone-conserving revision stem for unstable intertrochanteric fractures of the geriatric osteoporotic population.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2022Article
- High Revision Rates of a Cementless Beta-Titanium Alloy Stem with Contamination-Free Roughened Surface in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Outcome evaluation of new calcium titanate schanz-screws for external fixators. First clinical results and cadaver studies.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2019Article
- A new classification for proximal femur bone defects in conservative hip arthroplasty revisions.International orthopaedics · 2019Article
- Use of the Corail stem for revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of clinical outcomes and costCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2019Article
- Mid-term outcomes of titanium modular neck femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Article
- A new classification for proximal femur bone defects in conservative hip arthroplasty revisions.International orthopaedics · 2019Article
- Citations, non-citations and visibility of International Orthopaedics in 2017.International orthopaedics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFemoral component revision with either cemented or proximally coated stems has been disappointing, but revision with extensively coated stems has been promising. Our purpose was to evaluate the long-term outcome using an extensively hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stem in femoral revisions surgery.
methodsDuring 1988-1993 we performed 66 femoral revisions in 65 patients (49 women), mean age 58 (range, 28-86) years. We used a grit-blasted straight stem made of TiAl
resultsDuring follow-up, 21 patients have died. One patient had a traumatic fracture around the stem after six years, and another patient with osteoporosis developed fatigue fracture of the femoral bone after 22 years. In one patient the cup loosened after 23 years. The cup was revised, but deep infection occurred, and the patient underwent a two-stage revision of both components. Then, 12 of the revised stems were followed for more than ten years and 24 for more than 20 years. During this time only one stem was revised due to mechanical failure. This patient had a femoral defect classified to Type IV, and a proximal fracture occurred when the prosthesis was inserted. The fracture was stabilised by wires, but primary stability of the stem could not be obtained. At control examinations no patients suffered from significant thigh pain, and we noticed a low degree of proximal bone loss and a low incidence of distal bone hypertrophy.
conclusionsOur study suggests that a fully HA-coated stem in femoral revision surgery can provide reliable results for up to 27 years. The bone changes confirmed a well-fixed femoral component with a rather physiological transfer of stress from proximal to distal regions with no significant thigh pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.