Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27130905›Full record

ReviewTrends in neurosciences2016

Toward Better Genetically Encoded Sensors of Membrane Potential.

Douglas Storace, Masoud Sepehri Rad, BokEum Kang, Lawrence B Cohen, Thom Hughes, Bradley J Baker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in neurosciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A dark quencher genetically encodable voltage indicator (dqGEVI) exhibits high fidelity and speed.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Studying Synaptically Evoked Cortical ResponsesFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  15. Imaging Voltage with Microbial Rhodopsins.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Voltage Imaging inFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Douglas StoraceDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.
Masoud Sepehri RadCenter for Functional Connectomics, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 136-791, Korea.
BokEum KangCenter for Functional Connectomics, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 136-791, Korea.
Lawrence B CohenDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Center for Functional Connectomics, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 136-791, Korea. Electronic address: lawrence.b.cohen@hotmail.com.
Thom HughesDepartment of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
Bradley J BakerCenter for Functional Connectomics, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST), Seoul, 136-791, Korea. Electronic address: bradley.baker19@gmail.com.

Funding

Optical Studies of Neuron Activity and OrganizationR01DC005259 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, LAWRENCE B · 2002 to 2019
$5.4M
New approaches for better protein voltage sensorsU01NS099691 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, LAWRENCE B · 2016 to 2018
$2.1M
Optical Studies of Neuron Activity and OrganizationR56DC005259 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, LAWRENCE B · 2007 to 2007
$413k
Splitting GFP to look at signaling proteinsR21NS054270 · NINDS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI HUGHES, THOMAS E · 2006 to 2007
$334k
Optical imaging of the input and output of the olfactory bulbF32DC012981 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STORACE, DOUGLAS ANTHONY · 2013 to 2015
$165k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC012981NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005259NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC005259NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS054270NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS099691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetically encoded optical sensors of cell activity are powerful tools that can be targeted to specific cell types. This is especially important in neuroscience because individual brain regions can include a multitude of different cell types. Optical imaging allows for simultaneous recording from numerous neurons or brain regions. Optical signals of membrane potential are useful because membrane potential changes are a direct sign of both synaptic and action potentials. Here we describe recent improvements in the in vitro and in vivo signal size and kinetics of genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs) and discuss their relationship to alternative sensors of neural activity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainMembrane PotentialsNeuronsVoltage-Sensitive Dye ImagingEhud Isacoffgenetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs)genetically encoded voltage indicators (GEVIs)Thomas Knopfel

Identifiers

PMID27130905
PMCPMC4852096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.