ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2016
Application of the microfluidic-assisted replication track analysis to measure DNA repair in human and mouse cells.
Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Special Methods collection on DNA helicases.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Functional studies of the roles that DNA helicases play in human cells have benefited immensely from DNA fiber (or single molecule) technologies, which enable us to discern minute differences in behaviors of individual replication forks in genomic DNA in vivo. DNA fiber technologies are a group of methods that use different approaches to unravel and stretch genomic DNA to its contour length, and display it on a glass surface in order to immuno-stain nucleoside analog incorporation into DNA to reveal tracks (or tracts) of replication. We have previously adopted a microfluidic approach to DNA stretching and used it to analyze DNA replication. This method was introduced under the moniker maRTA or microfluidic-assisted Replication Track Analysis, and we have since used it to analyze roles of the RECQ helicases WRN and BLM, and other proteins in normal and perturbed replication. Here we describe a novel application of maRTA to detect and measure repair of DNA damage produced by three different agents relevant to etiology or therapy of cancer: methyl-methanesulfonate, UV irradiation, and mitomycin C. Moreover, we demonstrate the utility of this method by analyzing DNA repair in cells with reduced levels of WRN or of the base excision repair protein XRCC1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.