Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27130199›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2016

Comparison and evaluation of biomechanical, electrical, and biological methods for assessment of damage to tissue collagen.

R Glenn Hepfer, Kelvin G M Brockbank, Zhen Chen, Elizabeth D Greene, Lia H Campbell, Gregory J Wright, Alyce Linthurst-Jones, Hai Yao

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Impact of Heat Treatment on Porcine Heart Valve Leaflets.Cardiovascular engineering and technology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R Glenn HepferClemson-MUSC Joint Bioengineering Program, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, 173 Ashley Avenue MSC 508, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Kelvin G M BrockbankClemson-MUSC Joint Bioengineering Program, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, 173 Ashley Avenue MSC 508, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Zhen ChenTissue Testing Technologies LLC, North Charleston, SC, USA.
Elizabeth D GreeneTissue Testing Technologies LLC, North Charleston, SC, USA.
Lia H CampbellTissue Testing Technologies LLC, North Charleston, SC, USA.
Gregory J WrightClemson-MUSC Joint Bioengineering Program, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, 173 Ashley Avenue MSC 508, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Alyce Linthurst-JonesLifeNet Health, Virginia Beach, VA, USA.
Hai YaoClemson-MUSC Joint Bioengineering Program, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, 173 Ashley Avenue MSC 508, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. haiyao@clemson.edu.
Clemson University · USLifenet Health · US

Funding

Integrating craniofacial morphology, oral function, temporomandibular biomechanics and mechanobiology to determine sex-specific TMJ pathophysiology in humansR01DE021134 · NIDCR · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI YAO, HAI · 2012 to 2025
$4.7M
Biophysical Modeling of Fluid and Solute Transport in the TMJ DiscR03DE018741 · NIDCR · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI YAO, HAI · 2009 to 2010
$223k
Biomechanical Characterization of Human Cartilaginous End-PlateR03AR055775 · NIAMS · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI YAO, HAI · 2009 to 2010
$147k
Biomechanical Characterization and Modeling of Human TMJ DiscF31DE023482 · NIDCR · CLEMSON UNIVERSITY · PI WRIGHT, GREGORY JOHN · 2013 to 2014
$87k
NIAMS NIH HHS R03 AR055775NIDCR NIH HHS F31 DE023482NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE021134NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE018741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In regard to evaluating tissue banking methods used to preserve or otherwise treat (process) soft allograft tissue, current tests may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect potential damage inflicted before, during, and after processing. Using controlled parameters, we aim to examine the sensitivity of specific biomechanical, electrical, and biological tests in detecting mild damage to collagen. Fresh porcine pulmonary heart valves were treated with an enzyme, collagenase, and incubated using various times. Controls received no incubation. All valves were cryopreserved and stored at -135 °C until being rewarmed for evaluation using biomechanical, permeability, and cell viability tests. Statistically significant time dependent changes in leaflet ultimate stress, (p = 0.006), permeability (p = 0.01), and viability (p ≤ 0.02, four different days of culture) were found between heart valves subjected to 0-15 min of collagenase treatment (ANOVA). However, no statistical significance was found between the tensile modulus of treated and untreated valves (p = 0.07). Furthermore, the trends of decreasing and increasing ultimate stress and viability, respectively, were somewhat inconsistent across treatment times. These results suggest that permeability tests may offer a sensitive, quantitative assay to complement traditional biomechanical and viability tests in evaluating processing methods used for soft tissue allografts, or when making changes to current validated methods. Multiple test evaluation may also offer insight into the mechanism of potential tissue damage such as, as is the case here, reduced collagen content and increased tissue porosity.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological PhenomenaAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCollagenElastic ModulusElectric ConductivityHeart ValvesHumansPermeabilityStress, MechanicalSus scrofaTensile StrengthTissue EngineeringTissue SurvivalCollagenCell viabilityCryopreservationHeart valveMatrix permeabilitySoft tissueTensile modulus

Identifiers

PMID27130199
PMCPMC5010934
OpenAlexW2344487845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.