ArticleDisability and health journal2016
Trends in colorectal cancer screening over time for persons with and without chronic disability.
Article in Disability and health journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Disability and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Pooled it
- Association of cancer characteristics with disability status and timing of onset among working-age cancer survivors.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Article
- Disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal cancer among patients with disabilities.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Impact of functional disability on health-care use and medical costs among cancer survivors.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2023Article
- Intersectionality of Race and Question-Asking in Women After Right Hemisphere Brain Damage.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Striving Toward Equity in Health Care for People With Communication Disabilities.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Population-Based Data Reveal Factors Associated with Organised and Non-Organised Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Important Step towards Improving Coverage.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Comparison of colorectal cancer screening between people with and without disability: a nationwide matched cohort study.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Perspectives of Patients with Pre-existing Mobility Disability on the Process of Diagnosing Their Cancer.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Associations Between Four Common Cancers and Disability.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2020Article
- Disparities in the Participation Rate of Colorectal Cancer Screening by Fecal Occult Blood Test among People with Disabilities: A National Database Study in South Korea.Cancer research and treatment · 2020Article
- Prevalence of Cancer Screening Among Adults With Disabilities, United States, 2013.Preventing chronic disease · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersons with disabilities have often experienced disparities in routine cancer screening. However, with civil rights protections from the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act, such disparities may diminish over time.
objectiveTo examine whether disability disparities exist for colorectal cancer screening and whether these screening patterns have changed over time.
methodsWe analyzed National Health Interview Survey responses from civilian, non-institutionalized U.S. residents 50-75 years old from selected years between 1998 and 2010. We specified 7 chronic disability indicators using self-reported functional impairments, activity/participation limitations, and expected duration. Separately for women and men, we conducted bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses examining associations of self-reported colorectal cancer screening services with sociodemographic factors and disability type.
resultsPatterns of chronic disability differed somewhat between women and men; disability rates generally rose over time. For both women and men, colorectal cancer screening rates increased substantially from 1998 through 2010. Over time, relatively few statistically significant differences were reported in colorectal cancer screening rates between nondisabled persons and individuals with various disabilities. In 2010, reported screening rates were generally comparable between nondisabled and disabled persons. In the few statistically significant differences, persons with disabilities almost always reported higher colorectal cancer screening rates than nondisabled individuals.
conclusionsAccording to national survey data, reported use of colorectal cancer screening is similar between nondisabled persons and individuals with a variety of different disability types. Despite physical demands of some colorectal cancer screening tests, disparities do not appear between populations with and without disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.