Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27130148›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2016

Reply to Erik Rud and Eduard Baco's Letter to the Editor re: Re: Jeffrey C. Weinreb, Jelle O. Barentsz, Peter L. Choyke, et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol 2016;69:16-40.

Jelle O Barentsz, Peter L Choyke, Francois Cornud, Masoom A Haider, Katarzyna J Macura, Daniel Margolis, Faina Shtern, Anwar R Padhani, Clare M Tempany, Harriet C Thoeny and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readLetterComment
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
21.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 125 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Targeted biopsy added to systematic biopsy improves cancer detection in prostate cancer screening.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2024
    Article
  7. Status ofWorld journal of urology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Jelle O BarentszRadboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Electronic address: jelle.barentsz@radboudumc.nl.
Peter L ChoykeNational Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Francois CornudRené Descartes University, Paris, France.
Masoom A HaiderUniversity of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Katarzyna J MacuraJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Daniel MargolisUniversity of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Faina ShternAdMeTech Foundation, Boston, MA, USA.
Anwar R PadhaniPaul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
Clare M TempanyHarvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
Harriet C ThoenyUniversity Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Sadhna VermaUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jeffrey C WeinrebYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
AdMeTech Foundation · USDélégation Paris 5 · FRHarvard University · USHealth Sciences Centre · CAJohns Hopkins University · USMount Vernon Hospital · GBNational Institutes of Health · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USYale University · US

Funding

Prostate Cancer ImagingZIABC010655 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI CHOYKE, PETER L · 2009 to 2025
$49.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID27130148
PMCPMC6386192
OpenAlexW2345204866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.