Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27129860›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

Seroprevalence and genotypes of Toxoplasma gondii isolated from pigs intended for human consumption in Liaoning province, northeastern China.

Dawei Wang, Yan Liu, Tiantian Jiang, Guoxin Zhang, Gaoming Yuan, Jianbin He, Chunlei Su, Na Yang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. First report of viableFood and waterborne parasitology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Low Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Changes of gut microbiota structure in rats infected withFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  10. Molecular Detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genotyping of viableParasitology · 2020
    Article
  14. BioMed research international · 2018
    Article
  15. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Genotypes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Seroepidemiology and Risk Factors ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dawei WangLaboratory of Zoonosis of Liaoning Province, College of Animal Science & Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P.R.China.
Yan LiuInstitute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, P.R.China.
Tiantian JiangDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996, USA.
Guoxin ZhangLaboratory of Zoonosis of Liaoning Province, College of Animal Science & Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P.R.China.
Gaoming YuanLaboratory of Zoonosis of Liaoning Province, College of Animal Science & Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P.R.China.
Jianbin HeLaboratory of Zoonosis of Liaoning Province, College of Animal Science & Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P.R.China.
Chunlei SuDepartment of Microbiology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, 37996, USA.
Na YangLaboratory of Zoonosis of Liaoning Province, College of Animal Science & Veterinary Medicine, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province, 110866, P.R.China. dayangna@163.com.
Shenyang Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · USChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic information for Toxoplasma gondii isolates from pigs in eastern, south, and southwestern regions of China has been reported previously. However, there are no data from pigs in the northeastern area of the country. To better understand the epidemiology of T. gondii, we determined the seroprevalence and genotypes of T. gondii from pigs slaughtered for human consumption in Liaoning province, northeastern China.

findingsOut of 2063 pigs examined, 233 (11.26%) were seropositive for T. gondii by the modified agglutination test (MAT), and viable parasites were isolated by bioassay in mice from 23 (9.87%) of the 233 seropositive pigs. Fifteen out of 23 isolates were genotyped using 10 PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) genetic markers including SAG1, SAG2, SAG3, BTUB, GRA6, c22-8, c29-2, L358, PK1 and Apico. One isolate was identified as ToxoDB genotype #3 (type II-variant), and one was genotype #1 or #3. The other 13 isolates were ToxoDB #9 (type Chinese 1).

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first report of T. gondii isolation and genotyping from pigs in northeastern China. This study indicates that pigs are a potential source for transmission of T. gondii to humans, therefore poses a potential public health concern. The genotyping results revealed the presence of genotype Chinese 1 in northeastern China, enriching the scope of T. gondii genotypes distribution in eastern Asia.

Indexed as

GenotypeAnimalsChinaFood ParasitologyHumansSeroepidemiologic StudiesSwineSwine DiseasesToxoplasmaToxoplasmosis, AnimalChinaGenotypePigSeroprevalenceToxoplasma gondii

Identifiers

PMID27129860
PMCPMC4851807
OpenAlexW2344553342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.