Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27129849›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Effectiveness and efficiency of an 11-week exercise intervention for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a controlled study in the context of health services research.

Inga Krauss, Gerhard Mueller, Georg Haupt, Benjamin Steinhilber, Pia Janssen, Nicola Jentner, Peter Martus

Abstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Inga KraussMedical Clinic, Department of Sports Medicine, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. inga.krauss@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Gerhard MuellerAllgemeine Ortskrankenkasse AOK, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.
Georg HauptMedical Clinic, Department of Sports Medicine, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Benjamin SteinhilberMedical Clinic, Department of Sports Medicine, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Pia JanssenMedical Clinic, Department of Sports Medicine, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Nicola JentnerMedical Clinic, Department of Sports Medicine, University Hospital, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 6, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
Peter MartusInstitute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometry, University Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoarthritis is the most common reason for pain in older adults, and the individual and economic burden of this disease is immense. The chronic character of osteoarthritis requires a long-term therapeutic treatment. In this regard life-style interventions such as physical exercises that can be carried out by the patient himself are recommended as first line treatment. There is evidence for the short-term benefit of exercise therapy in terms of pain reduction and physical functioning. Nonetheless research agendas highlight the need for multifaceted interventions that incorporate exercise strategies into patient care. Studies should be conducted with appropriate sample sizes and should allow statements on long-term effects as well as cost-utility and safety. These open questions are under the scope of this study. METHODS/

designThis is a controlled study in the context of health services research. The study population consists of n = 1400 subjects with hip or knee osteoarthritis. The intervention group will be recruited from participants of a country-wide health insurance offer for people with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Potential participants for the control group (ratio 10:1 (control vs. intervention) will be filtered out from the insurance data base according to pre-defined matching criteria and asked by letter for their participation. The final statistical twins from the responders (1:1) will be determined via propensity score matching. The progressive training intervention comprises 8 supervised group sessions, supplemented by home exercises (2/week over 11 weeks). Exercises include mobilization, strengthening and training of postural control. Primary outcomes are pain and function measured with the WOMAC Index immediately after the intervention period. Among other things, health related quality of life, self-efficacy, cost utility and safety will be evaluated as secondary outcomes. Participants will be followed up 6, 12 and 24 month after baseline. DISCUSSION: Results of this trial will document the effects of clinical as well as economic outcomes in a regular health care setting on the basis of a large sample size. As such, results of this trial might have great impact on future implementations of group- and home-based exercises in hip or knee osteoarthritis. TRAIL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00009251 . Registered 10 September 2015.

Indexed as

ExerciseHip JointKnee JointCase-Control StudiesClinical ProtocolsExercise TherapyFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMuscle StrengthOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneePainPostureQuality of LifeCost-analysisGroup trainingHealth care researchHip osteoarthritisHome exerciseKnee osteoarthritisLong-term effectsPropensity score matchingSafetyWOMAC

Identifiers

PMID27129849
PMCPMC4851810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.