Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27129738›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

Genes and Small RNA Transcripts Exhibit Dosage-Dependent Expression Pattern in Maize Copy-Number Alterations.

Tao Zuo, Jianbo Zhang, Andrew Lithio, Sudhansu Dash, David F Weber, Roger Wise, Dan Nettleton, Thomas Peterson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Small RNA-MediatedGenetics · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tao ZuoDepartment of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Jianbo ZhangDepartment of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Andrew LithioDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Sudhansu DashVirtual Reality Application Center, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
David F WeberSchool of Biological Sciences, Illinois State University, Normal, Illinois 61790.
Roger WiseCorn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Dan NettletonDepartment of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
Thomas PetersonDepartment of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011 thomasp@iastate.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9933-7556
Iowa State University · USIllinois State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy-number alterations are widespread in animal and plant genomes, but their immediate impact on gene expression is still unclear. In animals, copy-number alterations usually exhibit dosage effects, except for sex chromosomes which tend to be dosage compensated. In plants, genes within small duplications (<100 kb) often exhibit dosage-dependent expression, whereas large duplications (>50 Mb) are more often dosage compensated. However, little or nothing is known about expression in moderately-sized (1-50 Mb) segmental duplications, and about the response of small RNAs to dosage change. Here, we compared maize (Zea mays) plants with two, three, and four doses of a 14.6-Mb segment of chromosome 1 that contains ∼300 genes. Plants containing the duplicated segment exhibit dosage-dependent effects on ear length and flowering time. Transcriptome analyses using GeneChip and RNA-sequencing methods indicate that most expressed genes and unique small RNAs within the duplicated segments exhibit dosage-dependent transcript levels. We conclude that dosage effect is the predominant regulatory response for both genes and unique small RNA transcripts in the segmental dosage series we tested. To our knowledge this is the first analysis of small RNA expression in plant gene dosage variants. Because segmental duplications comprise a significant proportion of eukaryotic genomes, these findings provide important new insight into the regulation of genes and small RNAs in response to dosage changes.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantGene DosageGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenome, PlantRNA, PlantSegmental Duplications, GenomicSequence Analysis, RNAZea maysRNA, Plantcopy-number alterationsdosage effectmaizephenotypic variationssmall RNAs

Identifiers

PMID27129738
PMCPMC4937467
OpenAlexW2343045970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.