Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27129595›Full record

SynthesisReviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders2016

A Genome-Wide Association Study in isolated populations reveals new genes associated to common food likings.

Nicola Pirastu, Maarten Kooyman, Michela Traglia, Antonietta Robino, Sara M Willems, Giorgio Pistis, Najaf Amin, Cinzia Sala, Lennart C Karssen, Cornelia Van Duijn and 2 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nicola PirastuInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy. nicola.pirastu@burlo.trieste.it.
Maarten KooymanGenetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Michela TragliaDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Antonietta RobinoInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.
Sara M WillemsGenetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Giorgio PistisDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Najaf AminGenetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cinzia SalaDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Lennart C KarssenGenetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Cornelia Van DuijnGenetic Epidemiology Unit, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniela TonioloDivision of Genetics and Cell Biology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy.
Paolo GaspariniInstitute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food preferences are the first factor driving food choice and thus nutrition. They involve numerous different senses such as taste and olfaction as well as various other factors such as personal experiences and hedonistic aspects. Although it is clear that several of these have a genetic basis, up to now studies have focused mostly on the effects of polymorphisms of taste receptor genes. Therefore, we have carried out one of the first large scale (4611 individuals) GWAS on food likings assessed for 20 specific food likings belonging to 4 different categories (vegetables, fatty, dairy and bitter). A two-step meta-analysis using three different isolated populations from Italy for the discovery step and two populations from The Netherlands and Central Asia for replication, revealed 15 independent genome-wide significant loci (p < 5 × 10(-8)) for 12 different foods. None of the identified genes coded for either taste or olfactory receptors suggesting that genetics impacts in determining food likings in a much broader way than simple differences in taste perception. These results represent a further step in uncovering the genes that underlie liking of common foods that in the end will greatly help understanding the genetics of human nutrition in general.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyFood PreferencesGenetic LociHumansAssociation studyFood choiceFood consumptionFood preferencesGWASIsolated populations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.