Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27129450›Full record

ReviewVirologica Sinica2016

Zika virus and Zika fever.

Zhaoyang Wang, Peigang Wang, Jing An

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Virologica Sinica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Emergence of Zika virus infection in China.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Zika virus genome biology and molecular pathogenesis.Emerging microbes & infections · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhaoyang WangDepartment of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China.
Peigang WangDepartment of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China. pgwang@ccmu.edu.cn.
Jing AnDepartment of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China. anjing@ccmu.edu.cn.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An emerging mosquito-borne arbovirus named Zika virus (ZIKV), of the family Flaviviridae and genus Flavivirus, is becoming a global health threat. ZIKV infection was long neglected due to its sporadic nature and mild symptoms. However, recently, with its rapid spread from Asia to the Americas, affecting more than 30 countries, accumulating evidences have demonstrated a close association between infant microcephaly and Zika infection in pregnant women. Here, we reviewed the virological, epidemiological, and clinical essentials of ZIKV infection.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease OutbreaksFemaleGlobal HealthHumansInsect VectorsMicrocephalyPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousZika VirusZika Virus Infectionmicrocephalyneuronal disorderZika feverZika host interactionZika virus

Identifiers

PMID27129450
PMCPMC8193459
OpenAlexW2344644581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.