Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27129417›Full record

ArticleJournal of structural biology2016

Pushing the size limit of de novo structure ensemble prediction guided by sparse SDSL-EPR restraints to 200 residues: The monomeric and homodimeric forms of BAX.

Axel W Fischer, Enrica Bordignon, Stephanie Bleicken, Ana J García-Sáez, Gunnar Jeschke, Jens Meiler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of structural biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The contribution of modern EPR to structural biology.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Axel W FischerDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Enrica BordignonDepartment of Physics, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin 14195, Germany.
Stephanie BleickenInterfaculty Institute of Biochemistry, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany.
Ana J García-SáezInterfaculty Institute of Biochemistry, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen 72074, Germany.
Gunnar JeschkeLaboratory of Physical Chemistry, ETH Zürich, Zürich 8093, Switzerland.
Jens MeilerDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. Electronic address: jens.meiler@vanderbilt.edu.

Funding

Membrane Protein Structure Elucidation from sparse NMR data (KAMP)R01GM080403 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS · 2007 to 2019
$3.0M
Computational Design of Protein-Ligand Interfaces - a Therapeutic StrategyR01GM099842 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
Small Molecule Probes to Investigate Structure and Function of Y ReceptorsR01DK097376 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MEILER, JENS, WEAVER, C DAVID · 2013 to 2015
$1.0M
GPU-Accelerated Parallel Computer for Drug Discovery ApplicationsS10OD020154 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, JARROD ANSON · 2015 to 2015
$225k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK097376NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM080403NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structure determination remains a challenge for many biologically important proteins. In particular, proteins that adopt multiple conformations often evade crystallization in all biologically relevant states. Although computational de novo protein folding approaches often sample biologically relevant conformations, the selection of the most accurate model for different functional states remains a formidable challenge, in particular, for proteins with more than about 150 residues. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy can obtain limited structural information for proteins in well-defined biological states and thereby assist in selecting biologically relevant conformations. The present study demonstrates that de novo folding methods are able to accurately sample the folds of 192-residue long soluble monomeric Bcl-2-associated X protein (BAX). The tertiary structures of the monomeric and homodimeric forms of BAX were predicted using the primary structure as well as 25 and 11 EPR distance restraints, respectively. The predicted models were subsequently compared to respective NMR/X-ray structures of BAX. EPR restraints improve the protein-size normalized root-mean-square-deviation (RMSD100) of the most accurate models with respect to the NMR/crystal structure from 5.9Å to 3.9Å and from 5.7Å to 3.3Å, respectively. Additionally, the model discrimination is improved, which is demonstrated by an improvement of the enrichment from 5% to 15% and from 13% to 21%, respectively.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein FoldingAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsbcl-2-Associated X ProteinElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyHumansMolecular StructureProtein ConformationProtein Multimerizationbcl-2-Associated X ProteinAb initioDEEREPRPELDORProtein structureProtein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID27129417
PMCPMC4912045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.