Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27128972›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Proteotranscriptomic Analysis Reveals Stage Specific Changes in the Molecular Landscape of Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Benjamin A Neely, Christopher E Wilkins, Laura A Marlow, Dariya Malyarenko, Yunee Kim, Alexandr Ignatchenko, Heather Sasinowska, Maciek Sasinowski, Julius O Nyalwidhe, Thomas Kislinger and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. The CCN axis in cancer development and progression.Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin A NeelyDepartment of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6120-7695
Christopher E WilkinsDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, United States of America.
Laura A MarlowDepartment of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America.
Dariya MalyarenkoDepartment of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Yunee KimDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexandr IgnatchenkoPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Heather SasinowskaINCOGEN, Inc., Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Maciek SasinowskiINCOGEN, Inc., Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America.
Julius O NyalwidheDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, United States of America.
Thomas KislingerDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
John A CoplandDepartment of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jacksonville, Florida, United States of America.
Richard R DrakeDepartment of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, United States of America.
Eastern Virginia Medical School · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Toronto · CAWilliams (United States) · USPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Felicity Enders · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
Visual Programming Tool for Integrated Gene/Protein Networks in Cancer ResearchR44CA125807 · NCI · INCOGEN, INC. · PI SASINOWSKI, MACIEK · 2008 to 2011
$3.4M
RhoB in cancer pathogenesis and as a target in combinatorial therapyR01CA136665 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI COPLAND, JOHN A., SMALLRIDGE, ROBERT · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
TGF Beta receptor biology in human renal cell carcinomaR01CA104505 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC JACKSONVILLE · PI COPLAND, JOHN A. · 2004 to 2009
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS R01 CA104505NCI NIH HHS R01 CA136665NCI NIH HHS R44 CA125807
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma comprises 2 to 3% of malignancies in adults with the most prevalent subtype being clear-cell RCC (ccRCC). This type of cancer is well characterized at the genomic and transcriptomic level and is associated with a loss of VHL that results in stabilization of HIF1. The current study focused on evaluating ccRCC stage dependent changes at the proteome level to provide insight into the molecular pathogenesis of ccRCC progression. To accomplish this, label-free proteomics was used to characterize matched tumor and normal-adjacent tissues from 84 patients with stage I to IV ccRCC. Using pooled samples 1551 proteins were identified, of which 290 were differentially abundant, while 783 proteins were identified using individual samples, with 344 being differentially abundant. These 344 differentially abundant proteins were enriched in metabolic pathways and further examination revealed metabolic dysfunction consistent with the Warburg effect. Additionally, the protein data indicated activation of ESRRA and ESRRG, and HIF1A, as well as inhibition of FOXA1, MAPK1 and WISP2. A subset analysis of complementary gene expression array data on 47 pairs of these same tissues indicated similar upstream changes, such as increased HIF1A activation with stage, though ESRRA and ESRRG activation and FOXA1 inhibition were not predicted from the transcriptomic data. The activation of ESRRA and ESRRG implied that HIF2A may also be activated during later stages of ccRCC, which was confirmed in the transcriptional analysis. This combined analysis highlights the importance of HIF1A and HIF2A in developing the ccRCC molecular phenotype as well as the potential involvement of ESRRA and ESRRG in driving these changes. In addition, cofilin-1, profilin-1, nicotinamide N-methyltransferase, and fructose-bisphosphate aldolase A were identified as candidate markers of late stage ccRCC. Utilization of data collected from heterogeneous biological domains strengthened the findings from each domain, demonstrating the complementary nature of such an analysis. Together these results highlight the importance of the VHL/HIF1A/HIF2A axis and provide a foundation and therapeutic targets for future studies. (Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD003271 and MassIVE with identifier MSV000079511.).

Indexed as

Signal TransductionTranscriptomeAgedCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease ProgressionFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKidneyKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedProteinsProteomicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID27128972
PMCPMC4851420
OpenAlexW2343761586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.