Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27128779›Full record

SynthesisTelemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association2016

The Empirical Foundations of Telemedicine Interventions in Primary Care.

Rashid L Bashshur, Joel D Howell, Elizabeth A Krupinski, Kathryn M Harms, Noura Bashshur, Charles R Doarn

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 128 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
128citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

128 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Partnering with rural libraries to increase telehealth utilization in New York state.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

68 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rashid L Bashshur1 University of Michigan Health System, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Joel D Howell2 Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Elizabeth A Krupinski4 Department of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Emory University , Atlanta, Georgia .
Kathryn M Harms5 Family Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Noura Bashshur1 University of Michigan Health System, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Charles R Doarn6 Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Cincinnati , Cincinnati, Ohio.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis article presents the scientific evidence for the merits of telemedicine interventions in primary care. Although there is no uniform and consistent definition of primary care, most agree that it occupies a central role in the healthcare system as first contact for patients seeking care, as well as gatekeeper and coordinator of care. It enables and supports patient-centered care, the medical home, managed care, accountable care, and population health. Increasing concerns about sustainability and the anticipated shortages of primary care physicians have sparked interest in exploring the potential of telemedicine in addressing many of the challenges facing primary care in the United States and the world. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe findings are based on a systematic review of scientific studies published from 2005 through 2015. The initial search yielded 2,308 articles, with 86 meeting the inclusion criteria. Evidence is organized and evaluated according to feasibility/acceptance, intermediate outcomes, health outcomes, and cost.

resultsThe majority of studies support the feasibility/acceptance of telemedicine for use in primary care, although it varies significantly by demographic variables, such as gender, age, and socioeconomic status, and telemedicine has often been found more acceptable by patients than healthcare providers. Outcomes data are limited but overall suggest that telemedicine interventions are generally at least as effective as traditional care. Cost analyses vary, but telemedicine in primary care is increasingly demonstrated to be cost-effective.

conclusionsTelemedicine has significant potential to address many of the challenges facing primary care in today's healthcare environment. Challenges still remain in validating its impact on clinical outcomes with scientific rigor, as well as in standardizing methods to assess cost, but patient and provider acceptance is increasingly making telemedicine a viable and integral component of primary care around the world.

Indexed as

Age FactorsCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ManagementGlobal HealthHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInternetMedicineMobile ApplicationsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient-Centered CarePrimary Health CareSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsTelemedicineText Messagingcostevidenceoutcomesprimary caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID27128779
PMCPMC4860623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.