Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27128693›Full record

Trial reportPediatric blood & cancer2016

Assessing the Prognostic Significance of Histologic Response in Osteosarcoma: A Comparison of Outcomes on CCG-782 and INT0133-A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Bone Tumor Committee.

Michael W Bishop, Yu-Chen Chang, Mark D Krailo, Paul A Meyers, Arthur J Provisor, Cindy L Schwartz, Neyssa M Marina, Lisa A Teot, Mark C Gebhardt, Richard Gorlick and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04890067 (Multicenter Observational Study on the Treatment of Patients With Localized Osteosarcoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04890067 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Multicenter Observational Study on the Treatment of Patients With Localized Osteosarcoma

TypeobservationalSponsorItalian Sarcoma GroupRan2021 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsLocalized OsteosarcomaArmsTreatment of Osteosarcoma according the AIEOP/ISG OS 2021 recommendations (includes drugs, surgery, radiotherapy or any other received treatments)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CT features of osteosarcoma lung metastasis: a retrospective study of 127 patients.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2023
    Article
  16. Recent and Ongoing Research into Metastatic Osteosarcoma Treatments.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Michael W BishopDepartment of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Yu-Chen ChangDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Mark D KrailoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Paul A MeyersDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
Arthur J ProvisorDivision of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Children's Hospital of Memorial University Medical Center, Savannah, Georgia.
Cindy L SchwartzDivision of Pediatrics, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Neyssa M MarinaDepartment of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital at Stanford, Palo Alto, California.
Lisa A TeotDepartment of Pathology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mark C GebhardtDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Richard GorlickDivision of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, The Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York.
Katherine A JanewayDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alexander J ChouDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DEVIDAS, MEENAKSHI · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI MEINZEN-DERR, JAREEN, STRAWN, JEFFREY ROBERT · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic value of histologic response for osteosarcoma may have changed with induction chemotherapy schedules over time. We hypothesized that the increased intensity of induction therapy provided on INT0133 compared to the Children's Cancer Group study CCG-782 would diminish the impact of histologic response on the risk of events after definitive surgery.

methodsRetrospective analysis was performed for patients aged <22 with newly diagnosed nonmetastatic osteosarcoma enrolled on CCG-782 and INT0133. Clinical factors were evaluated for association with response and outcome. Good response was defined as <5% viable tumor at resection. Associations of response, study, and postdefinitive surgery event-free survival (EFS-DS) were determined using Cox proportional hazard models. EFS-DS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology.

resultsData were available for 814 patients (206 CCG-782, 608 INT0133). For good responders, 10-year EFS-DS (±SE) was 75.4% ± 7.7% for CCG-782 and 70.8% ± 3.1% for INT0133. For poor responders, 10-year EFS-DS was 39.9% ± 4.9% for CCG-782 and 58.4% ± 3.1% for INT0133. Histologic response predicted outcome across studies (P < 0.0001). Significant interaction between study and histologic response was observed for EFS-DS (P = 0.011). Using proportional hazards regression, INT0133 poor responders had less risk of events compared to CCG-782 poor responders (relative hazard ratio (RHR) = 0.6:1), but good responders on INT0133 had a greater risk of events compared to CCG-782 good responders (RHR = 1.53:1).

conclusionWe observed an inverse relationship between the predictive value of tumor necrosis and intensity of induction therapy, raising questions about the true prognostic value of histologic response. This highlights the need for novel markers to develop strategies for treatment in future trials.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBone NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInduction ChemotherapyInfantMaleOsteosarcomaPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomebiomarkerchemotherapyhistologic responsenecrosisosteosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID27128693
PMCPMC5136499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.