Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27128687›Full record

ReviewGene therapy2016

Cardiac gene therapy: are we there yet?

P N Matkar, H Leong-Poi, K K Singh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Gene therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Cardiac gene delivery using ultrasound: State of the field.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. MTissue engineering. Part A · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Peptide-Based Supramolecular Hydrogels for Delivery of Biologics.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2016
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P N MatkarDepartment of Cardiology at Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
H Leong-PoiDepartment of Cardiology at Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
K K SinghDepartment of Vascular Surgery at Keenan Research Centre for Biomedical Science, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is increasing throughout the world and is associated with elevated morbidity and mortality. Gene therapy to treat cardiac dysfunction is gaining importance because of the limited therapeutic benefit offered by pharmacotherapies. The growing knowledge of the complex signaling pathways and the development of sophisticated vectors and delivery systems, are facilitating identification and targeting of specific molecular candidates involved in initiation and progression of CVDs. Several preclinical and clinical studies have shown the therapeutic efficiency of gene therapy in different disease models and patients. Hence, gene therapy might plausibly become an unconventional treatment modality for CVD patients. In this review, we summarize the gene delivery carriers, modes of delivery, recent preclinical/clinical studies and potential therapeutic targets. We also briefly discuss the existing limitations of gene therapy, technical challenges surrounding gene carriers and delivery systems, and some approaches to overcome these limitations for bringing CVD gene therapy one step closer to reality.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesClinical Trials as TopicGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHumans

Identifiers

PMID27128687
OpenAlexW2342811791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.