Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27128568›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology2016

Prognostic significance of mechanical biomarkers derived from pulse wave analysis for predicting long-term cardiovascular mortality in two population-based cohorts.

Hao-Min Cheng, Shao-Yuan Chuang, Jiun-Jr Wang, Yuan-Ta Shih, Hsin-Ning Wang, Chi-Jung Huang, Jui-Tzu Huang, Shih-Hsien Sung, Edward G Lakatta, Frank C P Yin and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The modified arterial reservoir: An update with consideration of asymptotic pressure (Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Hao-Min ChengDepartment of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Cardiovascular Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shao-Yuan ChuangDivision of Preventive Medicine and Health Service, Research Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.
Jiun-Jr WangSchool of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, Xinzhuang District, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
Yuan-Ta ShihMolecular Imaging Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Hsin-Ning WangFaculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chi-Jung HuangDepartment of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jui-Tzu HuangFaculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shih-Hsien SungDepartment of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Edward G LakattaThe Laboratory of Cardiovascular Science in the National Institute on Aging Intramural Research Program in Baltimore, MD, USA.
Frank C P YinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA.
Pesus ChouDepartment of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Jung YehDepartment of Public Health, Chung-Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chyi-Huey BaiSchool of Public Health, Taipei medical university.
Wen-Harn PanInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chen-Huan ChenDepartment of Medical Education, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Cardiovascular Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address: chench@vghtpe.gov.tw.
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TWChung Shan Medical University · TWFu Jen Catholic University · TWInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica · TWNational Health Research Institutes · TWNational Institute on Aging · USNational Taiwan University · TWTaipei Medical University · TWWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AG999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNumerous mechanical biomarkers derived from pulse wave analysis (PWA) have been proposed to predict cardiovascular outcomes. However, whether these biomarkers carry independent prognostic value and clinical utility beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors hasn't been systematically evaluated. We aimed to investigate the additive utility of PWA-derived biomarkers in two independent population-based cohorts.

methodsPWA on central arterial pressure waveforms obtained from subjects without a prior history of cardiovascular diseases of two studies was conducted based on the wave transmission and reservoir-wave theory: firstly in the Kinmen study (1272 individuals, a median follow-up of 19.8years); and then in the Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors Two-Township Study (2221 individuals, median follow-up of 10years). The incremental value of the biomarkers was evaluated by net reclassification index (NRI).

resultsIn multivariate Cox analyses accounting for age, gender, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, high-density- and low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, and smoking, only systolic (SC) and diastolic rate constant (DC) of reservoir pressure could independently and consistently predict cardiovascular mortality in both cohorts and the combined cohort (SC: hazard ratio 1.18 [95% confidence interval 1.08-1.28, p<0.001; DC: 1.18 [1.09-1.28], p<0.001]. Risk prediction estimates in traditional risk prediction models were significantly more accurate when incorporating peak of reservoir pressure (NRI=0.049, p=0.0361), SC (NRI=0.043, p=0.0236) and DC (NRI=0.054, p=0.047).

conclusionsOf all PWA-derived biomarkers, SC and DC were consistently identified as valuable parameters for incremental cardiovascular risk prediction in two large prospective cohorts.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesPulse Wave AnalysisRisk FactorsEpidemiologyMortalityPulse wave analysisReservoir pressureVascular agingWave reflection

Identifiers

PMID27128568
PMCPMC10617614
OpenAlexW2340748529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.