Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27127970›Full record

ArticlePhysical review letters2016

Scaling Behavior for Ionic Transport and its Fluctuations in Individual Carbon Nanotubes.

Eleonora Secchi, Antoine Niguès, Laetitia Jubin, Alessandro Siria, Lydéric Bocquet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Graphene in Water is Hardly Ever Neutral.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Anomalous ionic transport in tunable angstrom-size water films on silica.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eleonora SecchiLaboratoire de Physique Statistique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, UMR 8550, 24 Rue Lhomond 75005 Paris, France.
Antoine NiguèsLaboratoire de Physique Statistique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, UMR 8550, 24 Rue Lhomond 75005 Paris, France.
Laetitia JubinLaboratoire de Physique Statistique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, UMR 8550, 24 Rue Lhomond 75005 Paris, France.
Alessandro SiriaLaboratoire de Physique Statistique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, UMR 8550, 24 Rue Lhomond 75005 Paris, France.
Lydéric BocquetLaboratoire de Physique Statistique de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, UMR 8550, 24 Rue Lhomond 75005 Paris, France.

Funding

European Research Council 637748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this Letter, we perform an experimental study of ionic transport and current fluctuations inside individual carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The conductance exhibits a power law behavior at low salinity, with an exponent close to 1/3 versus the salt concentration in this regime. This behavior is rationalized in terms of a salinity dependent surface charge, which is accounted for on the basis of a model for hydroxide adsorption at the (hydrophobic) carbon surface. This is in contrast to boron nitride nanotubes which exhibit a constant surface conductance. Further, we measure the low frequency noise of the ionic current in CNTs and show that the amplitude of the noise scales with the surface charge, with data collapsing on a master curve for the various studied CNTs at a given pH.

Identifiers

PMID27127970
PMCPMC4984977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.