Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27127635›Full record

ArticleOpen heart

Prehospital and in-hospital use of healthcare resources in patients surviving acute coronary syndromes: an analysis of the EPICOR registry.

Lieven Annemans, Nicolas Danchin, Frans Van de Werf, Stuart Pocock, Muriel Licour, Jesús Medina, Héctor Bueno

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01171404 (Long-term Follow-up of Antithrombotic Management Patterns in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01171404 completednot on this map

Long-term Follow-up of Antithrombotic Management Patterns in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorAstraZenecaRan2010 to 2013Enrolled10,568ConditionsACS, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Lieven AnnemansDepartment of Public Health , I-CHER Interuniversity Centre for Health Economics Research , Ghent University , Ghent , Belgium.
Nicolas DanchinDépartement de Cardiologie , Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou & Université René Descartes , Paris , France.
Frans Van de WerfDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine , University Hospitals Leuven , Leuven , Belgium.
Stuart PocockLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , UK.
Muriel LicourMedical Department , AstraZeneca France , Rueil Malmaison Cedex , France.
Jesús MedinaObservational Research Centre, Payer & Real World Evidence, AstraZeneca , Madrid , Spain.
Héctor BuenoCentro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC); Cardiology Department, Instituto de Investigación i+12, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre; Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
AstraZeneca (France) · FRAstraZeneca (Spain) · ESGhent University · BEHôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou · FRKU Leuven · BELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this report is to provide insight into real-world healthcare resource use (HCRU) during the critical management of patients surviving acute coronary syndromes (ACS), using data from EPICOR (long-tErm follow-up of antithrombotic management Patterns In acute CORonary syndrome patients) (NCT01171404).

methodsEPICOR was a prospective, multinational, observational study that enrolled 10 568 ACS survivors from 555 hospitals in 20 countries in Europe and Latin America, between September 2010 and March 2011. HCRU was evaluated in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS), with or without a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Multivariable analysis was performed to determine factors that affected resource use.

resultsBefore hospitalisation, more patients with STEMI than with NSTE-ACS had their first ECG (44.1% vs 36.4%, p<0.0001) and received antithrombotic medication (26.6% vs 15.2%, p<0.0001). Patients with NSTE-ACS with prior CVD were less likely than those without to be catheterised (73.1% vs 82.8%, p<0.0001). More patients with STEMI than with NSTE-ACS had percutaneous coronary intervention (77.1% vs 54.9%, p<0.0001), but fewer underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (1.2% vs 3.7%, p<0.0001). Multivariable analysis showed that resource use, including length of hospital stay and coronary revascularisation, was significantly influenced by multiple factors, including ACS type, site characteristics and region (all p≤0.05).

conclusionsIn this large-scale, real-life study, findings were generally in line with clinical logic, although site characteristics and region still significantly affected resource use. Moreover, and unexpectedly, resource use tended to be slightly higher in patients without a history of CVD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01171404 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Identifiers

PMID27127635
PMCPMC4847130
OpenAlexW2283624062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.