Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27126906›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2016

A scoping review of geographic information systems in maternal health.

Prestige T Makanga, Nadine Schuurman, Peter von Dadelszen, Tabassum Firoz

Erratum issuedAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prestige T MakangaHealth Geography Research Group, Geography Department, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada; Department of Surveying and Geomatics, Midlands State University, Gweru, Zimbabwe. Electronic address: pmakanga@sfu.ca.
Nadine SchuurmanHealth Geography Research Group, Geography Department, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cardiovascular Sciences Research Centre, St George's, University of London, London, UK.
Tabassum FirozDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, New Westminster, BC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeographic information systems (GIS) are increasingly recognized tools in maternal health.

objectivesTo evaluate the use of GIS in maternal health and to identify knowledge gaps and opportunities. SEARCH STRATEGY: Keywords broadly related to maternal health and GIS were used to search for academic articles and gray literature. SELECTION CRITERIA: Reviewed articles focused on maternal health, with GIS used as part of the methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Peer reviewed articles (n=40) and gray literature sources (n=30) were reviewed. MAIN

resultsTwo main themes emerged: modeling access to maternal services and identifying risks associated with maternal outcomes. Knowledge gaps included a need to rethink spatial access to maternal care in low- and middle-income settings, and a need for more explicit use of GIS to account for the geographical variation in the effect of risk factors on adverse maternal outcomes. Limited evidence existed to suggest that use of GIS had influenced maternal health policy. Instead, application of GIS to maternal health was largely influenced by policy priorities in global maternal health.

conclusionsInvestigation of the role of GIS in contributing to future policy directions is warranted, particularly for elucidating determinants of global maternal health.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesFemaleGeographic Information SystemsGlobal HealthHealth PolicyHumansMaternal HealthGeographic information systemsGlobal healthHealth policyHealth servicesMaternal healthSpatial accessSpatial epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID27126906
PMCPMC4996913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.