SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2016
Characterizing ceftriaxone-induced urolithiasis and its associated acute kidney injury: an animal study and Chinese clinical systematic review.
Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nephrotoxicity of Amoxicillin and Third-Generation Cephalosporins: An Updated Review.Drug safety · 2023Review
- The Risk and Clinical Implications of Antibiotic-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: A Review of the Clinical Data for Agents with Signals from the Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Ceftriaxone Calcium Crystals Induce Acute Kidney Injury by NLRP3-Mediated Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Injury.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020Article
- Drug-Induced Urolithiasis in Pediatric Patients.Paediatric drugs · 2019Review
- Review
- Drug-Induced Kidney Stones and Crystalline Nephropathy: Pathophysiology, Prevention and Treatment.Drugs · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the pathophysiological process of ceftriaxone-induced urolithiasis and its associated acute kidney injury (AKI) based on an animal study and summarize the main clinical characteristics based on a Chinese clinical systematic review. MATERIALS AND
methodsMale Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into five groups of six each according to different treatments including control; ceftriaxone; ceftriaxone with calcium; calcium; and ceftriaxone, calcium with citrate, respectively. The 24-h urine volume, serum creatinine (Scr) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) were measured; kidney histological examination and stone analysis were performed. Systematic searches of the Chinese Knowledge Database were conducted for reports on ceftriaxone-induced urolithiasis and AKI. The eligibility of each full-text publication was accessed, and qualified data were extracted and reviewed.
resultsKidney stones and a significantly low 24-h urine volume with increased high Scr and BUN levels were found in the group that received ceftriaxone combined with calcium. Citrate was able to inhibit these biochemical changes and stone formations. A total of 161 qualified patients were included in the Chinese clinical systematic review: The proportion of ceftriaxone-induced urolithiasis was 21.1, 19.3, 19.3, 39.1 and 1.2 % for ages <3, 3-6, 7-17, 18-60 and >60 years. 72.7 % developed acute kidney injury eventually.
conclusionCeftriaxone-induced urolithiasis was associated with a high risk of AKI. The pathophysiological process may be related to urinary obstruction and crystalline nephropathy. Citrate was able to inhibit stone formation and prevent further kidney injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.