Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27126234›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2016

Deciphering intratumor heterogeneity using cancer genome analysis.

Daeun Ryu, Je-Gun Joung, Nayoung K D Kim, Kyu-Tae Kim, Woong-Yang Park

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Cellular and Genetic Background of Osteosarcoma.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Journal of Cancer · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cancer Prevention and Treatment by Wholistic Nutrition.Journal of nature and science · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Towards personalized tumor markers.NPJ precision oncology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daeun RyuSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Je-Gun JoungSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Nayoung K D KimSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Kyu-Tae KimSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Woong-Yang ParkSamsung Genome Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. woongyang@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intratumor heterogeneity within individual cancer tissues underlies the numerous phenotypes of cancer. Tumor subclones ultimately affect therapeutic outcomes due to their distinct molecular features. Drug-resistant subclones are present at a low frequency in tissues at the time of biopsy, but can also arise as a result of acquired somatic mutations. A number of different approaches have been utilized to understand the nature of intratumor heterogeneity. Clonal analysis using whole exome or genome sequencing data can help monitor subclones in the context of tumor progression. Multiregional biopsies permit the molecular characterization of subclones within tumors. Deep sequencing has also provided researchers with the ability to measure the low allele fraction variant within a small number of cells. Ultimately, single-cell sequencing will enable the identification of every minor population within a tumor microenvironment. In the clinical context, the ability to identify and monitor the subclonal architecture of a tumor is valuable for the development of precise cancer therapeutic methods.

Indexed as

Genetic HeterogeneityGenome, HumanExomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMutationNeoplasmsSequence Analysis, DNASingle-Cell Analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.