Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27125958›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2016

Clinical challenges with calcitonin-negative medullary thyroid carcinoma.

Maria Teresa Samà, Ruth Rossetto Giaccherino, Marco Gallo, Francesco Felicetti, Francesca Maletta, Nadia Bonelli, Alessandro Piovesan, Nicola Palestini, Ezio Ghigo, Emanuela Arvat

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Refractory thyroid carcinoma: which systemic treatment to use?Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. CALCITONIN REVISITED IN 2020.Acta endocrinologica (Bucharest, Romania : 2005)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maria Teresa SamàDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy. marysama@tiscali.it.
Ruth Rossetto GiaccherinoDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Marco GalloOncological Endocrinology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Francesco FelicettiOncological Endocrinology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Francesca MalettaPathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Nadia BonelliDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro PiovesanOncological Endocrinology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Nicola PalestiniSurgery Department, Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Ezio GhigoDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Emanuela ArvatOncological Endocrinology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Torino, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Citta' della Salute e della Scienza di Torino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMedullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a relatively uncommon malignant tumor of the parafollicular C cells of the thyroid, which distinguishing feature is the production of calcitonin (CT). CT is a well-recognized tool in the diagnosis and the postsurgical follow-up of patients with MTC with a high sensitivity and specificity, and represents a powerful prognostic indicator. Usually, there is a direct correlation between tumor size and basal CT levels. However, few cases of CT-negative MTCs have been reported in literature and criteria for diagnosis and follow-up are still controversial.

methodsWe performed a brief review on CT-negative MTC and reported our experience on this rare condition, focusing on the clinical characteristics at presentation, the histological and immunostaining features, and the management.

resultsFifteen cases of large, palpable, CT-negative MTCs have been reported in the literature so far; moreover, we reported four cases followed at our center.

conclusionsAlthough CT-negative MTC is rare, normal/low serum levels of CT and CEA cannot completely exclude the possibility of the diagnosis, when suspected. It is well accepted that early diagnosis is crucial, but there is still no consensus on the optimal postoperative surveillance strategy. The ultrasound evaluation of the cervical region, together with abdominal computerized tomography scan, chest X-ray, and fluorine18-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) PET/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT), would be recommended in the follow-up of such cases.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCalcitoninCarcinoma, NeuroendocrineDiagnostic ImagingHumansPrognosisThyroid NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCalcitoninCalcitoninFollow-upMedullary thyroid carcinomaPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID27125958
PMCPMC11819071
OpenAlexW2345025082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.