ArticleThe oncologist2016
A Validated Risk Score for Venous Thromboembolism Is Predictive of Cancer Progression and Mortality.
Article in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer.Blood advances · 2021Guideline
- Can thromboprophylaxis build a link for cancer patients undergoing surgical and/or chemotherapy treatment? The MeTHOS cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Trial
- Khorana Score: Νew Predictor of Early Mortality in Patients With Lung Adenocarcinoma.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018Trial
- Rivaroxaban for Preventing Venous Thromboembolism in High-Risk Ambulatory Patients with Cancer: Rationale and Design of the CASSINI Trial. Rationale and Design of the CASSINI Trial.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2017Trial
- Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Lung Cancer.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisTrial
- Machine learning-based prediction of peripherally inserted central catheter-related thrombosis in hematological malignancies: development and validation of a dynamic model in a multicenter cohort.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical dose of enoxaparin enhances oncolytic virus M1 infection and antitumor efficacy in human bladder cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting venous thromboembolism risk after gynecologic oncology surgery.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- The Crucial Role of Tinzaparin in Managing Venous Thromboembolism in the Cancer Population.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- The Association of Khorana Risk Score with Venous Thromboembolism and Overall Survival in Patients with Metastatic Gastric Cancer.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Thromboinflammatory Biomarkers Are Early Predictors of Disease Progression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2025Article
- Validating Khorana Risk Score in gastric cancer patients on immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy.Immunotherapy · 2025Article
- The risk of venous thromboembolism in primary central nervous system lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Review
- Occult cancer in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism: A nested case-control study.American journal of clinical pathology · 2024Article
- The Application of Existing Risk Assessment Models (RAMS) to Predict the Occurrence of Venous Thromboembolic Events among Patients with Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Association between the Khorana risk score and all-cause mortality in Japanese patients with gastric and colorectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Direct Oral Anticoagulant and Low Molecular Weight Heparin Therapies for Secondary Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis.Clinical drug investigation · 2022Article
- Performance Status and Long-Term Outcomes in Cancer-Associated Pulmonary Embolism: Insights From the Hokusai-VTE Cancer Study.JACC. CardioOncology · 2022Article
- Mitigating acute chemotherapy-associated adverse events in patients with cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRetrospective studies have suggested an association between cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) and patient survival. We evaluated a previously validated VTE Clinical Risk Score in also predicting early mortality and cancer progression.
methodsA large, nationwide, prospective cohort study of adults with solid tumors or lymphoma initiating chemotherapy was conducted from 2002 to 2006 at 115 U.S. practice sites. Survival and cancer progression were estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier. Multivariate analysis was based on Cox regression analysis adjusted for major prognostic factors including VTE itself.
resultsOf 4,405 patients, 134 (3.0%) died and 330 (7.5%) experienced disease progression during the first 4 months of therapy (median follow-up 75 days). Patients deemed high risk (n = 540, 12.3%) by the Clinical Risk Score had a 120-day mortality rate of 12.7% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 3.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-6.3), and intermediate-risk patients (n = 2,665, 60.5%) had a mortality rate of 5.9% (aHR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.4) compared with only 1.4% for low-risk patients (n = 1,200, 27.2%). At 120 days of follow-up, cancer progression occurred in 27.2% of high-risk patients (aHR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4-3.5) and 16.4% of intermediate-risk patients (aHR 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.7) compared with only 8.5% of low-risk patients (p < .0001).
conclusionThe Clinical Risk Score, originally developed to predict the occurrence of VTE, is also predictive of early mortality and cancer progression during the first four cycles of outpatient chemotherapy, independent from other major prognostic factors including VTE itself. Ongoing and future studies will help determine the impact of VTE prophylaxis on survival. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is increased in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. In this article, the authors demonstrate that a popular risk score for VTE in patients with cancer is also associated with the risk of early mortality in this setting. It is important that clinicians evaluate the risk of VTE in patients receiving cancer treatment and discuss the risk and associated symptoms of VTE with patients. Individuals at increased risk should be advised that VTE is a medical emergency and should be urgently diagnosed and appropriately treated to reduce the risk of serious and life-threatening complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.