Observational studyRevista espanola de salud publica2016
[Impact of the Pharmaceutical Copayment Reform on the Use of Antidiabetics, Antithrombotics and for Chronic Obstructive Airway Disease Agents, Spain].
Observational study in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effect of Changes in Cost Sharing on the Consumption of Prescription and Over-the-Counter Medicines in Catalonia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Analysis of the Prescription of Antibiotics During the Implementation of COVID-19 Personal Protection Measures in a Regional Health System.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2021Article
- Policies to Reduce Antibiotic Consumption: The Impact in the Basque Country.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Affordable and equitable access to subsidised outpatient medicines? Analysis of co-payments under the Additional Drug Package in Kyrgyzstan.International journal for equity in health · 2019Article
- Article
- Effect of cost sharing on adherence to evidence-based medications in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2017Article
- Use of Primary Care Services, Care Specialized and Drug Use by Population 65 Years and More in the Community of Madrid, Spain.Revista espanola de salud publica · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn 2012 it changed the Spanish legislation regulating the pharmaceutical copayment by the National Health System (NHS). The objective was to know if the Spanish pharmaceutical copayment reform in 2012 has affected drugs consumptions for chronic diseases such as antidiabetics, antithrombotics and agents against obstructive conditions of the respiratory tract.
methodsRetrospective longitudinal observational study, using general segmented linear regression models for interrupted time series. The variables analyzed were the number of defined daily doses (DDDs) and the amount corresponding to public funding and not public funding from the (NHS) since September 2010 to August 2015 (T=60).
resultsThe estimated variation rate of DDDs is negative but decreasing for the three therapeutic subgroups at 6, 12, 24 and 38 months after the intervention: -0.1% for antidiabetics after 6 months and 0.3% after 38 months; -3.7% for antithrombotics after 6 months and -4.6% after 38 months; -2.7% for asthma and COPD drugs after 6 months and -1.3% after 38 months. A sustained and significant reduction in expenditure was estimated only in the subgroup of asthma and COPD drugs: -5.2% after 6 months, -7.0% after 12 months and after 24 months, and -6.2% after 38 months.
conclusionsThe pharmaceutical copayment reform of 2012 led to an immediate and significant reduction in the number of DDDs of all three therapeutic subgroups selected in this study. This level effect is not permanent, as it is accompanied by a change in the growth trend in the post-intervention months, which has partly offset the effect on the level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27125567PMC11587480What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.