Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27125554›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2016

(1,3)-β-d-Glucan-based antifungal treatment in critically ill adults at high risk of candidaemia: an observational study.

Brunella Posteraro, Mario Tumbarello, Gennaro De Pascale, Elvira Liberto, Maria S Vallecoccia, Elena De Carolis, Valentina Di Gravio, Enrico M Trecarichi, Maurizio Sanguinetti, Massimo Antonelli

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Multicenter Prospective Study of Biomarkers for Diagnosis of Invasive Candidiasis in Children and Adolescents.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2022
    Observational
  15. Evaluation of the DynamikerInfectious diseases and therapy · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brunella PosteraroInstitute of Public Health (Section of Hygiene), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Mario TumbarelloInstitute of Infectious Diseases, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Gennaro De PascaleDepartment of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Elvira LibertoInstitute of Microbiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Maria S VallecocciaDepartment of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Elena De CarolisInstitute of Microbiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Valentina Di GravioDepartment of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Enrico M TrecarichiInstitute of Infectious Diseases, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Maurizio SanguinettiInstitute of Microbiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy maurizio.sanguinetti@unicatt.it.
Massimo AntonelliDepartment of Intensive Care and Anaesthesiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the effects of a strategy that uses serum (1,3)-β-d-glucan (BDG) results for antifungal treatment of ICU patients at high risk of invasive candidiasis. PATIENTS AND

methodsAdult patients admitted to the ICU from January 2012 to June 2014 were included if they exhibited sepsis at the time of BDG testing and they met Candida score components ≥3. A retrospective analysis of collected data was performed.

resultsIn total, 198 patients were studied. Of 63 BDG-positive patients, 47 with candidaemia and 16 with probable Candida infection, all [31.8% (63/198)] received antifungal therapy. Of 135 BDG-negative patients, 110 [55.5% (110/198)] did not receive antifungal therapy, whereas 25 [12.6% (25/198)] were initially treated. Overall, antifungal therapy was started in 88 cases (44.4%), mostly with echinocandins. Antifungals were discontinued in 14 of 25 patients, as negative BDG results became available, and in 16 BDG-false-positive patients for whom subsequent findings allowed candidaemia (and other forms of invasive candidiasis) to be ruled out. Candidaemia was diagnosed only in one patient who did not receive prior antifungal therapy. The median antifungal therapy duration in candidaemic patients differed significantly from that in non-candidaemic patients [14 (IQR, 6-18) days versus 4 (IQR, 3-7) days; P < 0.001]. Using this approach, antifungal therapy was avoided in ∼73% of potentially treatable patients and it was shortened in another ∼20%.

conclusionsThis study supports the use of serum BDG results in the management of systemic antifungal drug prescription in septic patients. These findings need to be confirmed in additional studies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntifungal AgentsAntigens, Fungalbeta-GlucansCandidiasis, InvasiveCritical IllnessFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProteoglycansRetrospective StudiesSepsisAntifungal AgentsAntigens, Fungalbeta-Glucanspolysaccharide-KProteoglycans

Identifiers

PMID27125554
OpenAlexW2342990795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.