Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27125210›Full record

ArticleJournal of anesthesia2016

Effects of dexmedetomidine on hemodynamics and respiration in intubated, spontaneously breathing patients after endoscopic submucosal dissection for cervical esophageal or pharyngeal cancer.

Chika Ishibashi, Masakazu Hayashida, Yusuke Sugasawa, Keisuke Yamaguchi, Natsumi Tomita, Yoshiaki Kajiyama, Eiichi Inada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chika IshibashiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan.
Masakazu HayashidaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan.
Yusuke SugasawaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan. ysugasa@juntendo.ac.jp.
Keisuke YamaguchiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan.
Natsumi TomitaDepartment of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki KajiyamaDepartment of Esophageal and Gastroenterological Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Eiichi InadaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Juntendo University School of Medicine, 3-1-3 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8431, Japan.
Juntendo University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated the hemodynamic and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine in intubated, spontaneously breathing patients after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for cervical esophageal or pharyngeal cancer.

methodsThis retrospective study included 129 patients aged 66.5 ± 8.3 years, who underwent ESD under general anesthesia, and who were kept intubated overnight to prevent airway obstruction, receiving sedation with dexmedetomidine. Constant dexmedetomidine infusion at 0.51 ± 0.16 μg/kg/h was started intraoperatively (n = 109) or postoperatively (n = 20), following (n = 29) or not following (n = 100) loading doses, and continued until extubation. Hemodynamic and respiratory variables, and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score, were recorded.

resultsPostoperatively, 129 patients remained intubated while breathing spontaneously for 16.4 ± 3.3 h, and 124 patients could be sedated solely with dexmedetomidine, whereas 5 required rescue sedatives. During infusion, blood pressure decreased progressively until 12 h, whereas heart rate decreased only at 3 h. Hemodynamic alterations during dexmedetomidine infusion greatly depended not only on its hemodynamic effects but also on baseline hemodynamics before anesthesia. No serious adverse effect was noted.

conclusionDexmedetomidine in intubated, spontaneously breathing patients after ESD was safe and effective. Patient baseline hemodynamics could significantly affect hemodynamics during drug infusion. Without loading doses, plasma drug concentrations were expected to increase progressively. A progressive decrease in blood pressure and unchanged heart rate after an initial decrease suggested that hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine in our patients might differ from those reported in young volunteers, although further studies are required to elucidate these points.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAirway ExtubationBlood PressureDexmedetomidineEndoscopic Mucosal ResectionFemaleHeart RateHemodynamicsHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMiddle AgedPharyngeal NeoplasmsPsychomotor AgitationDexmedetomidineHypnotics and SedativesDexmedetomidineEndoscopic submucosal dissectionHemodynamicsRespirationSedation

Identifiers

PMID27125210
OpenAlexW2345292858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.