Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27124615›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Effects of Isoflavone-Enriched Feed on the Rumen Microbiota in Dairy Cows.

Jitka Kasparovska, Martina Pecinkova, Katerina Dadakova, Ludmila Krizova, Sylvie Hadrova, Matej Lexa, Jan Lochman, Tomas Kasparovsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Isoflavones.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jitka KasparovskaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Martina PecinkovaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Katerina DadakovaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ludmila KrizovaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Sylvie HadrovaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Matej LexaDepartment of Information Technologies, Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jan LochmanDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Tomas KasparovskyDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Masaryk University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we compared the effects of two diets containing different isoflavone concentrations on the isoflavone transfer from feed into milk and on the rumen microbiota in lactating dairy cows. The on-farm experiment was conducted on twelve lactating Czech Fleckvieh x Holstein cows divided into two groups, each with similar mean milk yield. Twice daily, cows were individually fed a diet based on maize silage, meadow hay and supplemental mixture. Control group (CTRL) received the basal diet while the experimental group (EXP) received the basal diet supplemented with 40% soybean isoflavone extract. The average daily isoflavone intake in the EXP group (16 g/day) was twice as high as that in the CTRL group (8.4 g/day, P<0.001). Total isoflavone concentrations in milk from the CTRL and EXP groups were 96.89 and 276.07 μg/L, respectively (P<0.001). Equol concentrations in milk increased from 77.78 μg/L in the CTRL group to 186.30 μg/L in the EXP group (P<0.001). The V3-4 region of bacterial 16S rRNA genes was used for metagenomic analysis of the rumen microbiome. The experimental cows exhibited fewer OTUs at a distance level of 0.03 compared to control cows (P<0.05) and reduced microbial richness compared to control cows based on the calculated Inverse Simpson and Shannon indices. Non-metric multidimensional scaling analysis showed that the major contributor to separation between the experimental and control groups were changes in the representation of bacteria belonging to the phyla Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Planctomycetes. Surprisingly, a statistically significant positive correlation was found only between isoflavones and the phyla Burkholderiales (r = 0.65, P<0.05) and unclassified Betaproteobacteria (r = 0.58, P<0.05). Previous mouse and human studies of isoflavone effects on the composition of gastrointestinal microbial populations generally report similar findings.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAnimal FeedAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsBacillotaBacteriaBacteroidetesBetaproteobacteriaBurkholderiaceaeCattleDietFemaleGlycine maxIsoflavonesLactationMicrobiotaIsoflavonesPlant ExtractsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID27124615
PMCPMC4849651
OpenAlexW2345131535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.