ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2016
Prognostication of Uveal Melanoma: A Work in Progress.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uveal Melanoma: 5-Year Update on Incidence, Treatment, and Survival (SEER 1975-2020).Ocular oncology and pathology · 2025Article
- Estrogen Receptor Is Expressed in Uveal Melanoma: A Potential Target for Therapy.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2021Article
- Nation-Wide Trends in Incidence-Based Mortality of Patients with Ocular Melanoma in USA: 2000 to 2018.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Uveal Melanoma: 5-Year Update on Incidence, Treatment, and Survival (SEER 1973-2013).Ocular oncology and pathology · 2018Article
- Comparison of Gene Expression Profiling and Chromosome 3 Analysis by Fluorescent in situ Hybridization and Multiplex Ligation Probe Amplification in Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Specimens of Uveal Melanoma.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2017Article
- Prognostication for Uveal Melanoma: Are Two Tests Better than One?Ocular oncology and pathology · 2017Article
- PRiMeUM: A Model for Predicting Risk of Metastasis in Uveal Melanoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
- Comment on
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27124594What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.