Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27124395›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Molecular Predictors of Long-Term Survival in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients.

Jie Lu, Matthew C Cowperthwaite, Mark G Burnett, Max Shpak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Multi-Omics Approaches in Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Survival analysis and associated factors of highgrade glioma patientsBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Brain tumour genetic network signatures of survival.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Molecular and Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genome-Wide Analysis of Glioblastoma Patients with Unexpectedly Long Survival.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jie LuNeuroTexas Institute Research Foundation, St. David's Healthcare, Austin, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8530-4502
Matthew C CowperthwaiteNeuroTexas Institute Research Foundation, St. David's Healthcare, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Mark G BurnettNeuroTexas Institute Research Foundation, St. David's Healthcare, Austin, Texas, United States of America.
Max ShpakNeuroTexas Institute Research Foundation, St. David's Healthcare, Austin, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive adult primary brain cancer, with <10% of patients surviving for more than 3 years. Demographic and clinical factors (e.g. age) and individual molecular biomarkers have been associated with prolonged survival in GBM patients. However, comprehensive systems-level analyses of molecular profiles associated with long-term survival (LTS) in GBM patients are still lacking. We present an integrative study of molecular data and clinical variables in these long-term survivors (LTSs, patients surviving >3 years) to identify biomarkers associated with prolonged survival, and to assess the possible similarity of molecular characteristics between LGG and LTS GBM. We analyzed the relationship between multivariable molecular data and LTS in GBM patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), including germline and somatic point mutation, gene expression, DNA methylation, copy number variation (CNV) and microRNA (miRNA) expression using logistic regression models. The molecular relationship between GBM LTS and LGG tumors was examined through cluster analysis. We identified 13, 94, 43, 29, and 1 significant predictors of LTS using Lasso logistic regression from the somatic point mutation, gene expression, DNA methylation, CNV, and miRNA expression data sets, respectively. Individually, DNA methylation provided the best prediction performance (AUC = 0.84). Combining multiple classes of molecular data into joint regression models did not improve prediction accuracy, but did identify additional genes that were not significantly predictive in individual models. PCA and clustering analyses showed that GBM LTS typically had gene expression profiles similar to non-LTS GBM. Furthermore, cluster analysis did not identify a close affinity between LTS GBM and LGG, nor did we find a significant association between LTS and secondary GBM. The absence of unique LTS profiles and the lack of similarity between LTS GBM and LGG, indicates that there are multiple genetic and epigenetic pathways to LTS in GBM patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsChildCluster AnalysisCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualDNA MethylationFemaleGene DosageGenotypeGlioblastomaBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID27124395
PMCPMC4849730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.