ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017
Doctors' engagements with patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care: a qualitative study.
Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Health system responsiveness: a systematic evidence mapping review of the global literature.International journal for equity in health · 2021Pooled it
- Development and validation of the Primary Care Organizations Organizational Health Literacy Scales (PCO-OHL Scales): a dual perspective from clients and healthcare providers.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- A Taxonomy for Health Information Systems.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- How do Patients and Managers Value Gold Standard Elements in Primary Health Care.Journal of patient experience · 2024Article
- Feedback reports to the general practitioner (GP) on the patients' experiences: are GPs interested, and is this interest associated with GP factors and patient experience scores?Family practice · 2023Article
- The Impact of Feedback Modalities and the Influence of Cognitive Load on Interpersonal Communication in Nonclinical Settings: Experimental Study Design.JMIR human factors · 2023Article
- Patient and healthcare provider perceptions on using patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) in routine clinical care: a systematic review of qualitative studies.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2022Review
- Co-produced capability framework for successful patient and staff partnerships in healthcare quality improvement: results of a scoping review.BMJ quality & safety · 2022Article
- Role of Technology in Self-Assessment and Feedback Among Hospitalist Physicians: Semistructured Interviews and Thematic Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Online patient feedback: a cross-sectional survey of the attitudes and experiences of United Kingdom health care professionals.Journal of health services research & policy · 2019Article
- Article
- Understanding Indigenous Australians' experiences of cancer care: stakeholders' views on what to measure and how to measure it.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Directing Improvements in Primary Care Patient Experience through Analysis of Service Quality.Health services research · 2018Article
- The Evaluation of Physicians' Communication Skills From Multiple Perspectives.Annals of family medicine · 2018Article
- Understanding and Using Patient Experience Feedback to Improve Health Care Quality: Systematic Review and Framework Development.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatient experience surveys are increasingly important in the measurement of, and attempts to improve, health-care quality. To date, little research has focused upon doctors' attitudes to surveys which give them personalized feedback.
aimThis paper explores doctors' perceptions of patient experience surveys in primary and secondary care settings in order to deepen understandings of how doctors view the plausibility of such surveys. DESIGN, SETTING AND
participantsWe conducted a qualitative study with doctors in two regions of England, involving in-depth semi-structured interviews with doctors working in primary care (n = 21) and secondary care (n = 20) settings. The doctors in both settings had recently received individualized feedback from patient experience surveys.
findingsDoctors in both settings express strong personal commitments to incorporating patient feedback in quality improvement efforts. However, they also concurrently express strong negative views about the credibility of survey findings and patients' motivations and competence in providing feedback. Thus, individual doctors demonstrate contradictory views regarding the plausibility of patient surveys, leading to complex, varied and on balance negative engagements with patient feedback. DISCUSSION: Doctors' contradictory views towards patient experience surveys are likely to limit the impact of such surveys in quality improvement initiatives in primary and secondary care. We highlight the need for 'sensegiving' initiatives (i.e. attempts to influence perceptions by communicating particular ideas, narratives and visions) to engage with doctors regarding the plausibility of patient experience surveys.
conclusionThis study highlights the importance of engaging with doctors' views about patient experience surveys when developing quality improvement initiatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.