Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27124219›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2016

Evaluating the Impact of Uncertainties in Clearance and Exposure When Prioritizing Chemicals Screened in High-Throughput Assays.

Jeremy A Leonard, Ashley Sobel Leonard, Daniel T Chang, Stephen Edwards, Jingtao Lu, Steven Scholle, Phillip Key, Maxwell Winter, Kristin Isaacs, Yu-Mei Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeremy A LeonardOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education , Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.
Ashley Sobel LeonardDepartment of Biological Sciences, Duke University , Durham, North Carolina 27708, United States.
Daniel T ChangChemical Computing Group, Montreal, QC H3A 2R7, Canada.
Stephen EdwardsNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Jingtao LuOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education , Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.
Steven ScholleNational Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Phillip KeyNational Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Maxwell WinterNational Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Kristin IsaacsNational Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Yu-Mei TanNational Exposure Research Laboratory, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, United States.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007171 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KONTOS, CHRISTOPHER D · 1985 to 2021
$31.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The toxicity-testing paradigm has evolved to include high-throughput (HT) methods for addressing the increasing need to screen hundreds to thousands of chemicals rapidly. Approaches that involve in vitro screening assays, in silico predictions of exposure concentrations, and pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristics provide the foundation for HT risk prioritization. Underlying uncertainties in predicted exposure concentrations or PK behaviors can significantly influence the prioritization of chemicals, though the impact of such influences is unclear. In the current study, a framework was developed to incorporate absorbed doses, PK properties, and in vitro dose-response data into a PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) model to allow for placement of chemicals into discrete priority bins. Literature-reported or predicted values for clearance rates and absorbed doses were used in the PK/PD model to evaluate the impact of their uncertainties on chemical prioritization. Scenarios using predicted absorbed doses resulted in a larger number of bin misassignments than those scenarios using predicted clearance rates, when comparing to bin placement using literature-reported values. Sensitivity of parameters on the model output of toxicological activity was examined across possible ranges for those parameters to provide insight into how uncertainty in their predicted values might impact uncertainty in activity.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationToxicity TestsHumansKineticsModels, TheoreticalUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID27124219
PMCPMC5783724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.