Observational studyMedicine2016

Association of Metformin Use With Cancer-Specific Mortality in Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Curative Resection: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.

Young-Seok Seo, Yun-Jung Kim, Mi-Sook Kim, Kyung-Suk Suh, Sang Bum Kim, Chul Ju Han, Youn Joo Kim, Won Il Jang, Shin Hee Kang, Ha Jin Tchoe and 7 more

Open access · goldFull text readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph read 4 numbers from its abstract, feeding 1 cell of the map: it supports the treatment in 1. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

4numbers the graph read from it
1cell of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
0.51 · no effect
All-cause mortalityfavours the treatment · against placebo · liver, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.380.30 to 0.49
In the fully adjusted analyses, metformin users showed a significantly lower risk of HCC-specific mortality (HR 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.49) and retreatment events (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.33-0.52) compared with metformin nonusers.
All-cause mortalityfavours the treatment · against placebo · liver, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.400.32 to 0.51
In the unadjusted analyses, metformin users showed a significant lower risk of HCC-specific mortality than the metformin nonusers (hazard ratio [HR] 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.51).
All-cause mortalityfavours the treatment · against placebo · liver, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.410.33 to 0.52
In the fully adjusted analyses, metformin users showed a significantly lower risk of HCC-specific mortality (HR 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.49) and retreatment events (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.33-0.52) compared with metformin nonusers.

Read, but not usablea number the graph found but could not read as for or against

All-cause mortalitycomparator not stated · liver, t2dfeeds one cell of the map
HR 0.570.41 to 0.78
Incidence and HRs of HCC-Specific Mortality and Retreatment Event by Metformin Use Subgroup analysis of metformin users found the adjusted risk for HCC-specific mortality to be significantly lower for patients with an MPR of ≥80%, compared with those having an MPR of <80% (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41-0.78).

clause the extractor read what became the number

2 · Its place on the map

Where it lands on the map

Rows are treatments, columns are outcomes. The coloured squares are the cells this paper feeds, coloured by the vote it casts there. Click one to jump to what this paper adds to it.

supports the treatmentfavours the comparatorno clear differenceread, but no usable result
3 · What it changes

What it adds to each cell

For every cell the paper feeds: the belief in the claim with and without this paper, and this paper's estimate drawn against every other readable study in the cell. The ringed dot is this paper.

Metformin×all-cause mortality

SupportsOpen on the map →What to test next →

1 readable study in this cell: 0 favour the treatment, 1 find no difference, 0 favour the comparator.

Belief with this paper
0.25no deciding trial · 0 families support, 0 contradict · against placebo
Without itNot a counted family in this claim, so removing it changes nothing.
← favours the treatmentfavours the comparator →
1 · no effect
NCT000387272,779 enrolled · 1996
HR 0.990.79 to 1.25

This paper's own estimate is on a different scale from the rest of the cell, so it is not drawn here.

4 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

5 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
6 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

7 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Young-Seok SeoFrom the Department of Radiation Oncology (Y-SS, M-SK, WIJ), Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences; Division for Healthcare Technology Assessment Research (Y-JK, M-SK, SHK, HJT, CMP, AJJ, HJK, JAC, MJK), National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency; Department of General Surgery (K-SS), Seoul National University Hospital; Department of General Surgery (SBK); Department of Internal Medicine (CJH, YJK), Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences; Department of Anatomy (HJC), Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; and Department of Oncology (MNP), McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Yun-Jung Kim
Mi-Sook Kim
Kyung-Suk Suh
Sang Bum Kim
Chul Ju Han
Youn Joo Kim
Won Il Jang
Shin Hee Kang
Ha Jin Tchoe
Chan Mi Park
Ae Jung Jo
Hyo Jeong Kim
Jin A Choi
Hyung Jin Choi
Michael N Polak
Min Jung Ko
Environment Agency · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

8 · The paper itself

Abstract

The marked sentences are the ones the graph read a number from.

Many preclinical reports and retrospective population studies have shown an anticancer effect of metformin in patients with several types of cancer and comorbid type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this work, the anticancer effect of metformin was assessed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with T2DM who underwent curative resection.A population-based retrospective cohort design was used. Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service and Korea Center Cancer Registry in the Republic of Korea, identifying 5494 patients with newly diagnosed HCC who underwent curative resection between 2005 and 2011. Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models to estimate effects. In the sensitivity analysis, we excluded patients who started metformin or other oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) after HCC diagnosis to control for immortal time bias.From the patient cohort, 751 diabetic patients who were prescribed an OHA were analyzed for HCC-specific mortality and retreatment upon recurrence, comparing 533 patients treated with metformin to 218 patients treated without metformin. In the fully adjusted analyses, metformin users showed a significantly lower risk of HCC-specific mortality (HR 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.49) and retreatment events (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.33-0.52) compared with metformin nonusers. Risks for HCC-specific mortality were consistently lower among metformin-using groups, excluding patients who started metformin or OHAs after diagnosis.In this large population-based cohort of patients with comorbid HCC and T2DM, treated with curative hepatic resection, metformin use was associated with improvement of HCC-specific mortality and reduced occurrence of retreatment events.

Indexed as

HepatectomyAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCause of DeathCohort StudiesComorbidityDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Disease-Free SurvivalFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMetforminMiddle AgedRepublic of KoreaAntineoplastic AgentsMetformin

Identifiers

PMID27124061
PMCPMC4998724
OpenAlexW2343254145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.