Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27123956›Full record

ArticleChildhood obesity (Print)2016

Infant Growth following Maternal Participation in a Gestational Weight Management Intervention.

Emily F Gregory, Matthew A Goldshore, Janice L Henderson, Robert D Weatherford, Nakiya N Showell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Childhood obesity (Print), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emily F Gregory1 General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD.
Matthew A Goldshore2 Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, MD.
Janice L Henderson3 Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD.
Robert D Weatherford3 Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD.
Nakiya N Showell1 General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine , Baltimore, MD.

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchKL2TR001077 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2013 to 2017
$9.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is widespread and treatment strategies have demonstrated limited success. Changes to obstetrical practice in response to obesity may support obesity prevention by influencing offspring growth trajectories.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study examined growth among infants born to obese mothers who participated in Nutrition in Pregnancy (NIP), a prenatal nutrition intervention at one urban hospital. NIP participants had Medicaid insurance and BMIs of 30 kg/m(2) or greater. We compared NIP infant growth to a historical control cohort, matched on maternal factors: age, race/ethnicity, prepregnancy BMI, parity, and history of prepregnancy hypertension or preterm birth.

resultsGrowth data were available for 61 NIP and 145 control infants. Most mothers were African American (94%). Mean maternal BMI was 39.9 kg/m(2) (standard deviation [SD], 5.6) for NIP participants and 38.8 kg/m(2) (SD, 6.0) for controls. Pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth, gestational diabetes, and birth weight, did not differ between groups. NIP participants were more likely to attend a postpartum visit (69% vs. 52%; p value, 0.03). At 1 year, 17% of NIP infants and 15% of controls had weight-for-length (WFL) ≥95th percentile (p value, 0.66). Other markers of accelerated infant growth, including crossing WFL percentiles and peak infant BMI, did not differ between groups.

conclusionsThere was no difference in growth between infants whose mothers participated in a prenatal nutrition intervention and those whose mothers did not. Existing prenatal programs for obese women may be inadequate to prevent pediatric obesity without pediatric collaboration to promote family-centered support beyond pregnancy.

Indexed as

MothersWeight GainAdultBirth WeightBody Mass IndexDirective CounselingFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleObesityPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID27123956
PMCPMC5583552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.