Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27123485›Full record

ArticleNeurology. Genetics2016

Copy number variants in absence epilepsy: Further complications of the picture.

Chantal Depondt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chantal DepondtDepartment of Neurology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Université Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After years of largely unsuccessful association studies attempting to detect genetic variants underlying common epilepsies, the recent identification of copy number variants (CNVs) in epilepsy has generated a lot of excitement. CNVs are defined as genomic deletions or duplications larger than 1 kb and up to several Mb in size. A proportion occur at genomic hotspots (recurrent CNVs), whereas others can occur anywhere in the genome. Although individually rare, these CNVs collectively constitute the single largest risk factor for sporadic epilepsies known to date. Depending on the exact phenotype, CNVs have been reported in up to 28% of patients with epilepsy.(1) Subsequently, exon-disrupting deletions in a range of genes previously implicated in a variety of neurodevelopmental disorders were also identified in patients with epilepsy.(2-4) Genetic generalized epilepsy (GGE), either associated or not associated with intellectual disability, is the most commonly reported phenotype in patients carrying these CNVs. The GGEs comprise a large group of phenotypically heterogeneous disorders with a known or presumed genetic cause, which may vary from rare monogenic cases to complex polygenic inheritance.

Identifiers

PMID27123485
PMCPMC4830202
OpenAlexW2323441810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.