Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27123373›Full record

ArticleWorm

Why do worms go against the flow? C. elegans behaviors explained by simple physics.

Haim H Bau, David Raizen, Jinzhou Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Worm. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Rheotactic Responses inEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  3. Microfluidic-AssistedCyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Haim H BauDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics; University of Pennsylvania ; Philadelphia, PA USA.
David RaizenDepartment of Neurology; Perelman School of Medicine; University of Pennsylvania ; Philadelphia, PA USA.
Jinzhou YuanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Applied Mechanics; University of Pennsylvania ; Philadelphia, PA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly half a century of neurobiological research using the nematode Caenorahbitis elegans has produced a remarkably detailed understanding of how genotype controls behavioral phenotype. However, the role of simple physical forces in regulating behavior has been understudied. Here, we review our recent observations of 3 behaviors of C. elegans suspended in solution that can be fully explained by the laws of mechanics. These behaviors are bordertaxis, the attraction toward solid surfaces; positive rheotaxis, the propensity to swim against the flow; and synchrophilia, the tendency of animals when close to each other to synchronize their gaits. Although these 3 behaviors are not directly regulated by the animal's nervous system, bordertaxis and rheotaxis require the animal to have an undulating gait. We conjecture that these behaviors are advantageous to the animals, and thus evolution may have favored microorganism that swim with an undulating gait.

Identifiers

PMID27123373
PMCPMC4826152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.