ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2016
Advanced therapy medicinal products: current and future perspectives.
Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 158 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of Managed Entry Agreements for Innovative Therapies in Different Settings and Combinations: A Feasibility Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Pooled it
- Cold Plasma-Enabled Interface Engineering and In-Situ Functionalization of Printable Feedstocks in Additive Manufacturing: Mechanisms, Materials, and Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Revolutionizing Renal Replacement: Current Advancements in Development and Transplantation of Bioengineered Kidneys.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A decade of innovation in healthcare: Automation, bio-printing and digital twin technologies for personalized therapies.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Next-generation therapies for osteoarthritis: the evolving role of cell therapy products.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Global Pharmaceutical Regulation: Comparative Frameworks and Operations.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Designs of the clinical trials aiming at evaluating cell and gene therapy products: A critical appraisal from a literature review.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Review
- Multifactorial bioengineering in the tendon context to maintain tenocyte phenotype and to direct dermal fibroblasts towards tenogenic lineage.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Rare disease clinical trials in Italy (2022-May 2026): current trends, future challenges, and the evolving role as reporting member state.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Addressing clinical uncertainties in ATMP reimbursement: a review of methodological guidelines and European practice.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Expert assessment of the attributes of high-cost medications: a case study of CAR T-cell therapy in the gulf cooperation council.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Advances in extracellular vesicle-based nanomedicine for regenerative orthopaedics.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Therapeutic potential and mechanistic insights into adipose-derived stem cells and mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in patients with Crohn's disease-associated fistulas: challenges and future perspectives.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Managing costly new drugs to support equitable access: international collaboration and patient engagement to assess value, and managed entry agreements.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025Article
- Risk Minimisation Measures of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products Authorised in the EU Between 2009 and 2023: A Cross-Sectional Study.Drug safety · 2025Article
- Advances in corneal transplantation.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- The clinical quality management system of advanced therapy medicinal products in the hospital setting: A scoping review.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Review
- The Role and Challenges of Investigator-Initiated Trials in the Cell and Gene Therapy Products Boom in Mainland China.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Volumetric Additive Manufacturing for Cell Printing: Bridging Industry Adaptation and Regulatory Frontiers.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2025Review
- Bioengineering breakthroughs: The impact of stem cell models on advanced therapy medicinal product development.World journal of stem cells · 2024Review
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdvanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) are innovative therapies that encompass gene therapy, somatic cell therapy, and tissue-engineered products. These therapies are expected to bring important health benefits, but also to substantially impact the pharmaceuticals budget.
objectiveThe aim of this study was to characterise the ATMPs in development and discuss future implications in terms of market access.
methodsClinical trials were searched in the following databases: EudraCT (EU Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials), ClinicalTrials.gov, and ICTRP (International Clinical Trials Registry Platform of the World Health Organization). Trials were classified by category of ATMP as defined by European regulation EC No. 1394/2007, as well as by development phase and disease area.
resultsThe database search identified 939 clinical trials investigating ATMPs (85% ongoing, 15% completed). The majority of trials were in the early stages (Phase I, I/II: 64.3%, Phase II, II/III: 27.9%, Phase 3: 6.9%). Per category of ATMP, we identified 53.6% of trials for somatic cell therapies, 22.8% for tissue-engineered products, 22.4% for gene therapies, and 1.2% for combined products (incorporating a medical device). Disease areas included cancer (24.8%), cardiovascular diseases (19.4%), musculoskeletal (10.5%), immune system and inflammation (11.5%), neurology (9.1%), and others. Of the trials, 47.2% enrolled fewer than 25 patients. Due to the complexity and specificity of ATMPs, new clinical trial methodologies are being considered (e.g., small sample size, non-randomised trials, single-arm trials, surrogate endpoints, integrated protocols, and adaptive designs). Evidence generation post-launch will become unavoidable to address payers' expectations.
conclusionATMPs represent a fast-growing field of interest. Although most of the products are in an early development phase, the combined trial phase and the potential to cure severe chronic conditions suggest that ATMPs may reach the market earlier than standard therapies. Targeted therapies have opened the way for new trial methodologies, from which ATMPs could benefit to get early access. ATMPs may be the next source of major impact on payers' drug budgets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.