Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27123064›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2016

Pathological complete response rate in hormone receptor-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant FEC, followed by weekly paclitaxel administration: A retrospective study and review of the literature.

Takayoshi Kiba, Nao Morii, Hirotoshi Takahashi, Shinji Ozaki, Misao Atsumi, Fumi Masumoto, Hiroyasu Yamashiro

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 99% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takayoshi KibaDivision of Modern Medical Technology, Institute for Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan; Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Sendai, Miyagi 983-8512, Japan.
Nao MoriiDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan.
Hirotoshi TakahashiDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan.
Shinji OzakiDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan.
Misao AtsumiClinical Trial Management Office, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan.
Fumi MasumotoClinical Trial Management Office, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan.
Hiroyasu YamashiroDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Hiroshima 737-0023, Japan; Department of Breast Surgery, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Nara 632-8552, Japan.
National Hospital Organization · JPKure Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While tumor size, the presence of inflammatory carcinoma and lymph node involvement are the main prognostic factors of women with locally advanced breast cancer, the prognostic value of the estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status has not been fully clarified. The present study examined the therapeutic efficacy of a neoadjuvant fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide regimen (FEC), followed by weekly paclitaxel and/or trastuzumab administration, in the treatment of hormone receptor-negative breast cancer patients. Between April 2012 and February 2014, 14 patients with hormone receptor-negative local breast cancer (triple-negative type, 9 patients; HER2 type, 5 patients) were included in the study. In all cases, the histological type of the primary cancer was invasive ductal carcinoma. Among the 14 women who received the regimen, 5 presented with stage I cancer (35.7%), 3 with stage IIA (21.4%), 3 with stage IIB (21.4%), 1 with stage IIIB (7.1%) and 2 with stage IIIC (14.3%), according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. With regard to the tumor-node-metastasis classification, 5 patients were T1N0M0 (35.7%), 3 were T2N0M0 (21.4%), 3 were T2N1M0 (21.4%), 2 were T3N3M0 (14.3%) and 1 was T4N1M0 (7.1%). The pathological response was evaluated using resected tissue following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, according to the criteria established by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society. Patients were classified into pathological responders (grades 2 and 3, 71.4% of all patients) and non-responders (grade 1, 28.6% of all patients). A pathological complete response (pCR) was achieved in 50.0% of all cases (7/14); 44.4% of triple-negative-type cases (4/9) and 60.0% of HER2-type cases (3/5). Hematological and non-hematological toxicity was reversible and manageable. No patients withdrew from treatment, and favorable compliance was achieved. The present study demonstrated that neoadjuvant FEC followed by weekly administration of paclitaxel and/or trastuzumab induces a high pathological response and a high pCR rate in patients with hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Due to the high clinical benefit rate and acceptable safety profile, this regimen should be considered an acceptable neoadjuvant treatment option for hormone receptor-negative breast cancer.

Indexed as

breast cancerepirubicin and cyclophosphamide regimenfluorouracilpaclitaxelpathological complete response

Identifiers

PMID27123064
PMCPMC4841046
OpenAlexW2300620064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.