ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2014
QTc Heterogeneity in Rest Magnetocardiography is Sensitive to Detect Coronary Artery Disease: In Comparison with Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can magnetocardiography decrease ED overcrowding, increase hospital bed capacity, and save hospitals money?American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
- Magnetocardiography in the diagnosis of suspected ANOCA: a case series.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Resting Multielectrode Electrocardiogram for Detecting Coronary Artery Disease.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2025Article
- A comparison of magnetocardiography with noninvasive cardiac testing in the evaluation of patients with chest pain.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of magnetocardiography as a non-invasive tool for functional assessment of myocardial ischemia in patients with stable coronary artery disease.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Article
- Advances of magnetocardiography in application of adult and fetal cardiac diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Diagnostic Value of Magnetocardiography to Detect Abnormal Myocardial Perfusion: A Pilot Study.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
- National cost savings, operational and safety benefits from use of magnetocardiography in the assessment of emergency department chest pain patients.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024Article
- Accurate diagnosis of severe coronary stenosis based on resting magnetocardiography: a prospective, single-center, cross-sectional analysis.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2024Article
- Development of Magnetocardiograph without Magnetically Shielded Room Using High-Detectivity TMR Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Clinical magnetocardiography: the unshielded bet-past, present, and future.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Magnetocardiography for the detection of myocardial ischemia.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Effectiveness of magnetocardiography to identify patients in need of coronary artery revascularization: a cross-sectional study.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2020Article
- Magnetocardiography for identification of coronary ischemia in patients with chest pain and normal resting 12-lead electrocardiogram.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2020Article
- Chest Pain with Normal Thallium-201 Myocardial Perfusion Image - Is It Really Normal?Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2016Article
- Early Myocardial Repolarization Heterogeneity Is Detected by Magnetocardiography in Diabetic Patients with Cardiovascular Risk Factors.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStress nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is an established method for diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). However, radiation exposure limits its clinical application. Magnetocardiography (MCG) has been proposed as a non-contact, rapid and non-radiation technique with high reproducibility. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of rest MCG in CAD comparing to stress MPI.
methodsWe prospectively enrolled 55 patients with suspected CAD (64 ± 10 years) who were scheduled for coronary angiography (CA). MCG, stress (201)Tl MPI and CA were performed within 3 months. The spatial distribution maps of QTc interval (21 × 21 in resolution) were derived from a 64-channel MCG system (KRISS, Korea). T-wave propagation mapping, repolarization heterogeneity index with QTc dispersion and smoothness index of QTc (SI-QTc) were analyzed, and the diagnostic criteria for CAD were developed based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
resultsPatients with significant CAD (≥ 70% luminal stenosis, n = 36) had higher QTc dispersion and SI-QTc than controls (both p < 0.05). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 0.8330, 0.6842 for QTc dispersion ≥ 79 ms; 0.7778, 0.6842 for SI-QTc ≥ 9.1 ms; and 0.8611, 0.6842 for combination. There was no difference of area under ROC curve by using criteria of QTc dispersion ≥ 79 ms, SI-QTc ≥ 9.1 ms or combination (0.7588, 0.7310, 0.7727, p = NS), and non-inferior to stress MPI (p = NS).
conclusionsThe QTc heterogeneity parameters of rest MCG yield a good sensitivity and acceptable specificity for detection of CAD, and may provide an alternative to stress MPI without stress and radiation. KEY WORDS: Coronary artery disease (CAD); Magnetocardiography (MCG); Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI); Repolarization.
Identifiers
27122818PMC4834957What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.