ReviewActa Cardiologica Sinica2014
Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients with Heart Failure.
Review in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of aerobic exercise training on pulse wave velocity in adults with and without long-term conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Open heart · 2023Pooled it
- A multicentric, 2 × 2 factorial, randomised, open-label trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of structured physical activity training and cognitive behavioural therapy versus usual care in heart failure patients: a protocol for the PACT-HF trial.Wellcome open research · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular and Muscular Consequences of Work-Matched Interval-Type of Concentric and Eccentric Pedaling Exercise on a Soft Robot.Frontiers in physiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledReduced exercise capacity negatively affects the ability of patients with heart failure (HF) to perform activities required for daily life, further decreasing their independence and quality of life (QoL). Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) can effectively improve aerobic fitness and overall health status in patients with HF. Low referral rate is an important limitation that may impede successful CR, whereas the automatic referral and liaison strategies performed by some healthcare providers manifestly increase the CR referral rate. However, there is still controversy regarding the most effective exercise strategy for improving hemodynamic efficiency during daily activities in the HF population. Aerobic interval training (AIT), that includes alternating high- and low-intensity exercise sessions, may be a more effective modality for improving functional capacity than traditional moderate continuous training (MCT) in patients with HF. A novel AIT regimen designed in our previous study may substantially enhance the ability of ventilation-perfusion matching during exercise, which effects are accompanied by an improved global and disease-specific QoL in HF patients. Conversely, the traditional MCT regimen may only maintain these physiologic responses to exercise at pre-interventional status. By elucidating the relationship between physical activity and hemodynamic property, this review attempts to provide a CR strategy for developing suitable exercise prescription that ameliorates hemodynamic disturbance, further retarding the disease progression and improving health-related QoL in patients with HF. KEY WORDS: Aerobic capacity; Heart failure; Hemodynamics; Rehabilitation.
Identifiers
27122811PMC4834951W2227719429What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.